Chimpanzees Are Not ‘Persons,’ Appeals Court Says

5

Chimpanzees are not legal persons who have a right to be free, a New York state appeals said in a ruling Thursday that denied a request to move two captive apes to a sanctuary.

The unanimous decision was another setback for the Nonhuman Rights Project, a group that for several years has sought to persuade New York courts to grant writs of habeas corpus to chimpanzees. A court that agreed would be allowing the animals to challenge the legality of their “detention” – like human prisoners can do – and would also be acknowledging that the apes are not things but rather are legal persons entitled to bodily liberty.

At the center of the case are Tommy and Kiko, chimpanzees that the Nonhuman Rights Project says are kept in cages by private owners in New York. To support its case, the Nonhuman Rights Project, which is led by the animal rights lawyer Steven M. Wise, submitted 60 pages of affidavits from experts who described chimpanzees’ advanced cognitive and social abilities.

Previous courts that have ruled against the project have determined that chimpanzees could not be granted legal rights because they’re unable to bear “legal responsibilities and societal duties.” Wise argued that is incorrect, and he cited as examples infants or comatose people who possess rights despite an inability to assume legal responsibilities. To bolster that argument, the project’s expert affidavits also explained how chimps can have rights and responsibilities within peer groups and in settings with humans.

But the appeals court was unpersuaded by Wise or the affidavits.

“The asserted cognitive and linguistic capabilities of chimpanzees do not translate to a chimpanzee’s capacity or ability, like humans, to bear legal duties, or to be held legally accountable for their actions,” Justice Troy Webber wrote for the Appellate Division in Manhattan. Referring to babies and people in comas, Webber wrote, “This argument ignores the fact that these are still human beings, members of the human community.”

The Nonhuman Rights Project said in a statement that it was reviewing the decision, but it made clear that it would continue in its quest.

“For 2,000 years, all nonhuman animals have been legal things who lack the capacity for any legal rights. This is not going to change without a struggle,” Wise said. “Public opinion has begun to tilt in our favor since we started filing these lawsuits, likely as a result of them.”

(c) 2017, The Washington Post ยท Karin Brulliard

{Matzav}

5 COMMENTS

  1. The “people” who think chimps should be free, should perhaps be the ones living in a cage in the zoo!

  2. These guys are not just about granting legal rights to animals, but taking away human rights: either all creatures have rights or none. As it is impossible to grant rights to both a zebra and a lion, there’ll be severely limited rights for all, including humans, with the natural animalistic order of strongest having domination over the weakest – hence any kind of conscience going out the window, and any kind of cruelty and genocide possible. That was roughly Hitler’s mentality. These animal-rights liberal-fascists are inherently evil, even if some of them are too dumb to understand the full repercussions of their ideology, and have to be stopped.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here