Demjanjuk Says He’s Too Sick for Trial

7

demjanjuk-smallJohn Demjanjuk says he’s in too much pain to follow his trial on charges he served as a guard at a Nazi death camp. The 90-year-old told the Munich state court in a rare statement Tuesday that he belongs “in┬áthe hospital and not the courtroom.”The retired Ohio autoworker originally from Ukraine is standing trial on 28,060 counts of accessory to murder for allegedly having been a guard at Sobibor in occupied Poland. He denies ever having been a guard anywhere.

He has numerous ailments and his defense attorney has repeatedly said in past weeks that he is no longer fit for trial.

When judges asked him if he wanted to examine a document Tuesday, Demjanjuk said: “That is a joke, with my pain I cannot look at anything.”

{Zimbio/Matzav.com Newscenter}

7 COMMENTS

  1. Of course, IF he was NOT one of the wicked death camp guards, then he has to be free.

    But, if he WAS one of those guards or other death camp officers, then his claim now is the most brazen of brazen of brazen adaucity!!!!

    WHAT ABOUT THE “PAIN” OF THE MANY THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WHOM HE HELPED TORTURE????

    WHAT ABOUT THE MANY THOUSANDS OF ELDERLY PEOPLE OVER 90 WHOM HE HELPED MURDER????

  2. The Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka, for whose crimes John Demjanjuk came close to being hanged in Jerusalem, is imaginary:

    BLURB BIOGRAPHY OF JOHN DEMJANJUK, SO FAR
    http://www.xoxol.org/dem/blurb.html

    And that the Trawniki ID Card which links John Demjanjuk to Sobibor is a KGB forgery:

    LARRY STEWART’S COUNTERCLOCKWISE SOLUTION
    http://www.xoxol.org/traw/stewart.html

    The BLURB BIOGRAPHY above also touches on the principle that so long as “survivor” testimony is protected from cross-examination, and so long as our understanding of what happened at Treblinka and Sobibor depends entirely on “survivor” testimony, then it is fair to say that no one can be sure what happened at locations such as Treblinka and Sobibor.

    Another rather important point is that since ALL eyewitnesses that testified in Jerusalem that John Demjanjuk was Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka turn out to have been lying, it may be reasonable to ask whether all, or some, of the eyewitnesses and “co-prosecutors” in Munich aren’t lying as well. And we do know that ALL eyewitnesses in Jerusalem were lying because today it is acknowledged by everyone that John Demjanjuk was never at Treblinka, and because we also know that there was no Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here