Donald Trump: Al Gore ‘Should Be Stripped of Nobel Peace Prize After Record Snowstorms’


trump1Donald Trump has called for Al Gore to be stripped of the Nobel Peace prize he was awarded for campaigning on climate change. The billionaire tycoon said record-breaking snow storms proved that the former Vice-President was wrong on global warming, and that policies aimed at tackling carbon emissions were harming America’s economy.

His comments follow a string of high-profile attacks on climate change advocates.

Scientists have been forced to defend themselves after embarrassing admissions that some of their evidence was faulty.

Gore has become one of the world’s leading global warming activists since his documentary An Inconvenient Truth became a surprise hit in 2006. He was given the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007.

But Trump said the Nobel Committee should now strip him of the award following one of the worst ever winters in eastern America.

He said in a speech: ‘With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up and down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back from Al Gore.’

He added: ‘Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect us from global warming, when China and other countries couldn’t care less.

‘It would make us totally non-competitive in the manufacturing world, and China, Japan and India are laughing at America’s stupidity.’

A crowd of 500 at the businessman’s Trump National Golf Club in Westchester, New York, stood up and cheered the remarks, the New York Post reported.

Washington DC and surrounding areas were buried under more than two feet of snow last week in blizzards that President Barack Obama dubbed ‘Snowmageddon’.

But organizers of the Winter Olympics 3,000 miles away in Vancouver, Canada, had to ship in extra snow to ensure the games could go ahead despite unseasonably warm weather.

Many scientists have gone to great lengths to explain that the record snowfalls do not disprove man-made global warming, while some have even said climate change could have contributed to the storms.

But they face a growing movement of climate change sceptics in Britain and the US.

The scientific community has been forced onto the back foot following claims that climate data has been ‘manipulated’ to bolster the case for action on carbon emissions.

Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has resisted calls for his resignation after the body admitted a series of mistakes, including a false claim included in an influential report that Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035.

The panel has been mired in controversy since the leaking of emails from the climate change unit at The University of East Anglia, which appeared to show that data used to bolster the IPCC’s claims had been manipulated.

Critics also claim the UEA’s researchers acted to stop papers they did not like from being published in journals and refused to share their data with sceptics.

This week the unit’s former head Professor Phil Jones, performed a majot u-turn and admitted there had been no ‘statistically significant’ global warming in the last 15 years.

And new research cast serious doubt on temperature records from around the world which have been used as evidence for global warming.

{dailymail/Noam Newscenter}|


  1. I would not be suprised if this guy is proven wrong, but I still believe in recycling.
    If we don’t store things in our homes, why would we pollute the world. it does affect animals, the chemicals affect our skin, our organs, causes diseases. We do need to reduce pollution and take care of HaShem’s beautiful world.

  2. The reason there are record snowstorms is because warm air carries more moisture. This is a fact, and one that was predicted by global warming advocates years ago. Anyone who points to the storms as evidence against global warming is quite frankly making a fool of themselves. (There are plenty of other points worthy of debate, this isn’t one of them).
    and the correct spelling would be skeptics.

  3. To No. 4.
    I really liked your last line, “and the correct spelling would be skeptics”. The Oxford English Dictionary says both ways are OK, “c” or “k”. But people like you always know the answer. First there was eugenics, then there was second hand smoking, and now we got global warming. The moisture crap is just another form of “kastach” (excuse the Israeli slang).

  4. Intresting how so many have either admitted or seated themselves in deeper denial the thought of the amount of revenue the goverments around the world have gained over this with taxes and all sorts of congestion charges just goes to show how much profit is involved overhere and consider this, this was the coldest winter in the u.s. And europe and china and so all skeptics are basically deepseated fools because thats to many continents to pull over claims of vapors causing snow sorry sir your belief is an illusion look if you wanna call it strange global patterns then fine but to call it global warming well that a big lie with alot of goverments profiting as a result of floored claimer

  5. Was just wondering how this global warming argument works I mean to claim that snow is caused by vapors evaporating from global warming why that argument sounds almost like 1 plus 1 is 3 because vapors braught about ay heat would generaly generate rain I would of thought but hey just call it a fact and then nobody could even think of askin for a explaination

  6. I think if across 3 continents this winter we saw extreme cooling not seen in years some of the continents braking records well then to still claim global warming to be a fact with the claim that hot air vapors cause snow which is obviously part of the warm weather go figure that one well this just proves that somebody is loosing alot of money over this and is willing to argue nonsense to prove himself remember hashem runs this world and he has many times over provin weather men and all kinds of predictiments out there to be wrong and so while predicting is fine but to use it as an argument to levi taxes on everything why thats more like criminal activity

  7. As a doctor and researcher, I have looked into all of the studies out there, and the truth is that there is hardly any hard evidence for global warming. One of the leading innovators here even admitted that he purposely corrupted and distorted the statistics to make his case. It most certainly is a hoax, and does not have the support of the entire scientific community. It is merely a theory, albeit one that is entrenched in the poltiical biases of liberals and their tree-hugging, radical Marxist comrades. Pollution and chemical toxicity in our air, food, and water IS a serious concern, as is the nutritive quality of our food. It amazes me that parents give their kids nosh from frum labels that are absolutely horrendous, and contian all sorts of hydrogenated fats and white flours. People wonder why so many kids have ADD, ADHD, ODD, and conduct disorder.

  8. I am amazed at the ignorance of so many people. Our Baltimore Sun had an editorial which explained how glocal warming is adding to the moisture in the atmosphere and that is leading to the increased snow fall, not because it is colder but there is more water in the air. El Nino is another cause and is exacerbated by glocal warming. How can so many people so delude themselves? Frum Jews who ally themselves with the right wing are nuts.

  9. My, my, is that so, L. Oberstein? The Baltimore Sun really said that? Well, then, it must be true.

    Really, if they conceded on this one, they’ll soon have to admit the Evolution Theory is a hoax too. And we can’t have that, now, can we?

    ????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

  10. I especially like 4’s plural use of “themselves” when refering to individuals. It’s funny how people buy into whatever the “warmest” feed them. Do you really think they wouldn’t have a canned answer to any sign of cooling? Snowstorms, mhew! All caused by warmer air carrying more moisture.

  11. Sorry mr oberstein but firstly there are very strong and intellectual arguments against global warming with major professors who were initially dragged into this admitting its farce and so no this has nothing to do with right or left wing politics its just hard facts and secondly you use that vapor and snow argument once again but you fail once again to address the fact that snow comes from cold air and not from hot air and so if snow has dropped this year in record numbers AROUND THE WORLD; CHINA, EUROPE, U.S.A. then you gotta explain where this cold came from because vapor brings rain when its warm but not snow this is almost as simple as 1 plus 1 is 2 and not 3

  12. Does anybody here know the difference between “climate” and “weather?” Weather is what we just had here in Baltimore. “Climate” is the fact that out of the last four winters this is the only one with significant snow. (Making up for the other three, I guess.)

    Long term changes = climate

    Look out the window this morning = weather

    There ought to be remedial science for adults. Most of the posters here obviously did not get it in high school.

  13. Donald Trump is an authority on meteorology. Sure, and I just got the Nobel Prize in nuclear physics. Donald Trump is a businessman, not a scientist. Would you go to Donald Trump to treat a heart attack? Of course not. So why pay any attention when he talks about climate/weather? If he talks about how to make money, I’ll listen. Otherwise, I’ll stick with the guys with the college degrees.

  14. L.Oberstein,

    How smart. Thinking that an EDITORIALm is a source of unbiased and accurate information. An editorial is a piece of political opinion/propaganda. Not emes.

  15. Gore and The UN IPCC should be forced to give back their Nobel Peace Prize. The flaws in Gore’s film and the errors in the 2007 UN IPCC Report that have been discovered since the award was given should disqualify both parties. Irena Sendler who risked her life daily during World War II to save the lives of over 2,500 Jewish children is much more deserving. Please sign the petition to demand that Gore and the UN IPCC have their award taken away.