Email to Barack Obama Gets UK Teen Banned from U.S.


obama3UK teen Luke Angel sent an angry e-mail to the White House and was consequently visited by local police and banned for life from stepping foot on U.S. soil. This state of affairs proves that the U.S. government takes digital threats just as seriously as any others.

The 17-year-old Bedfordshire resident became upset after watching a TV documentary about 9/11, leading him to compose an expletive-laden e-mail that called U.S. President Barack Obama a “prick.” The FBI took the e-mail very seriously and contacted the local British police, who visited Angel at his home and took his picture, then informed him that he would not be able to enter the U.S.

It has become necessary for government officials to monitor e-mail and other social media to find potential threats. Last year, the nation of Colombia arrested a man who used Facebook to announce, “I promise to kill Jeronimo Alberto Uribe, son of Alvaro Uribe.” Alvaro Uribe was the president of Colombia.

While we harbor a healthy skepticism about some of the FBI’s online monitoring ambitions, it’s perfectly legit to use e-mails sent directly to the government to identify threats. That said, Angel claimed that he was drunk when he wrote the e-mail, so he might not be a long-term threat – but maybe you can never be too careful.

Angel said in a newspaper interview that he doesn’t care about the ban, but his parents are reportedly less than thrilled.



  1. Whats the threat? Disrespectful, yes. But not thretaning.

    Welcome to the USSR. We start off banning a far off English brat… then….

  2. Is an explative-laden email a threat that requires ‘banning’ someone? I’m all for investigating to determine if there’s a credible threat, but based on the information in this piece, this is a full frontal assault on freedom of speech.

  3. British newspapers today are treating this story, and the Obama administration’s response, with the scorn it deserves.

    (Oh nuts! I have to go: the FBI is banging on my front door.)

  4. This is fair enough. There must be some respect shown for authority. Will a divinely mandated Messianic Government based in Jerusalem be properly recognized, rewarded, heeded and respected ?