Joe Lieberman’s Advice On Being a VP Candidate

2

By Joseph I. Lieberman

On the morning after Al Gore and I conceded the 2000 election, I returned to my Senate office. The first call I got was from my friend, the former Senate majority leader, Bob Dole. “Hi, Joe,” he began. “I called to congratulate you.”

“For what, Bob?”

“You are now a member of a very exclusive club – people who have lost national elections. And I’m the leader of the club, because I’ve lost more than anyone else!”

It was the most therapeutic call I could have received.

In less than four months, either Indiana Gov. Mike Pence or Sen. Tim Kaine, Va., will be welcomed into Dole’s exclusive club. Vice-presidential candidates, here is some advice based on the extraordinary privilege and experience we share.

Never forget who gave you the opportunity to run.

The selection of a running mate by a presumptive presidential nominee has become one of the most unfettered exercises of power in our political system. I’ll always be grateful to Gore, especially since his decision to pick the first Jewish American for a major national ticket took courage and confidence in the American people.

Your indebtedness to the nominee doesn’t mean you have to bring him or her coffee every morning. But it does mean that he or she has the last word, hopefully after talking with you, on major policy and political decisions during the campaign – and, if it works out, in office.

Gore had a sense of humor about the relationship: One morning, he showed me a newspaper photo of the two of us taken the previous day. “Joe, as vice president for the last eight years, I have learned a lot about the responsibilities of the job,” he said. “In this picture, as I am speaking, you have already learned to strike a pose as you look at me that is vice-presidentially perfect – somewhere between profound respect and absolute awe!”

Don’t flip-flop.

To protect your credibility as a possible vice president, don’t abandon long-held beliefs because they are different from your running mate’s. As soon as you are chosen, the opposing party and the media will rush to point out issues on which you have disagreed with the presidential candidate or core constituencies of your party. In my case, they went after policies regarding school choice and tort reform.

My first public response was humor. When the Republicans said they and I thought alike on many issues, my speechwriter, Paul Orzulak, came up with this one: “That’s like saying veterinarians and taxidermists are in the same profession because either way you get your dog back.”

Uncertain whether that would be enough, the campaign and I agreed that I should tell reporters and unsettled interest groups that my position was my position – but if elected, the president’s position would prevail and I would support it.

Speak out inside the campaign.

If you feel your views are not being solicited, you should complain quickly to your presidential candidate. He or she chose you because you have experience, which can also be the basis for useful advice. Sometimes the campaign staff may forget that.

In 2000, I had to argue that I should speak in more places that allowed me to highlight the constructive role religion plays in our society. Eventually, they agreed.

It took me much longer – probably too long – to win the argument that I should campaign in the largely Republican Cuban-American community in Florida, where I had developed close friendships and alliances while in the Senate. Who knows whether that effort would have brought enough extra votes in Florida to have avoided the recount? It wouldn’t have taken many.

You won’t win all the battles you wage inside the campaign, but when it’s all over, you will be glad you tried.

Don’t believe the cynics who say vice-presidential picks don’t matter.

Particularly this year, when the two major-party presidential candidates are unfortunately disliked or distrusted by so many people, you can, by your record and your conduct in the campaign, tip the scales in favor of your ticket.

There are three times when you will be the center of national attention: the day your selection is announced, the evening you give your acceptance speech at the convention and at the vice-presidential debate. So make the most of those opportunities. They can help, and they can also hurt.

The rest of the time, you will not be invisible, because even when you are not traveling with the presidential candidate, you will have the media with you and the campaign will regularly want to take advantage of that by having you deliver a national message.

Don’t forget why you are so grateful and excited to be running.

You got into politics to serve our country, and now you have a chance to do so at a level you never dreamed of. As partisan and ideologically rigid as our politics have become, and as much as you, as a vice-presidential candidate, will be expected to carry the attack to the other party’s candidates, please don’t do it in a way that will make it impossible, if you are elected, to work with the other party to solve some of the United States’ biggest problems. Otherwise, even if you win the campaign battle, you will lose the war to make our country better.

As I look back on my experience in 2000, one of the moments I am proudest of is the vice-presidential debate with Dick Cheney. We strongly disagreed on most topics, but we did so in a way that was not personal or divisive. Of course, those were different times: It was pre-9/11, the economy was strong, people were feeling good about America’s future, and, although there was plenty of partisanship, a lot had been accomplished in the preceding years as a result of collaboration and compromise between the Democratic president and the Republican Congress. The way you conduct this year’s campaign can help us get closer to where we were in 2000.

The time from now until Election Day will be the most physically and intellectually demanding of your professional life.

You will work for 18 or 20 hours every day, often traveling to two or three states in a single day. You will be more sleep-deprived than ever before at the very time you will face more public scrutiny than ever before.

But I want to tell you from personal experience that it’s all worth it. The wonderful people you meet along the way will convince you of that.

If you are elected, you will have the opportunity to help lead our country out of one of its most difficult times. And if the election does not work out that well, expect a call from Bob Dole and me thanking you for a great campaign and welcoming you to our club.

– – –

Lieberman, a former U.S. senator from Connecticut, was the 2000 Democratic nominee for vice president. He is senior counsel at the New York law firm Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman.

Special To The Washington Post · Joseph I. Lieberman 

{Matzav.com}

2 COMMENTS

  1. He was pretty neat. I think that Al Gore was a bit naggy than interest and that is why Joe and Al did not perhaps get elected. One wonders if Anti-semitism had any role, but I remember no hits or hates from the murderers to attack Joe’s campaign nationally that year. Perhaps that is a good sign. Mr. Sanders appears to have at least 2 distinct incidents I remember regarding his jewish experience though his weak neshama for Torah and kosher values is one that makes one wonder how bad his incidental negativity induced more hate.

    Joe is a neat guy. Wish I could know more about him. I think he would have really inspired us if he had worn a kippah. It seems that jews in the public eye in America are likely afraid of any further jewish self-commital feelings in the public.

    Still, Mr. Leiberman is smart. I hope that his experience was not too bad. The hanging chad and the folding chad were to incendiary that no thought could be that the election was fully the fairness of all human hope.

    Lazy guy elected in the other place in history. We know the feeling we had instead of a jew and a liberal.

    Sad.

  2. Nice article. Well I hope for the sake of this great country that Senator Tim Kaine gets that call on the morning after.

LEAVE A REPLY