“I know it will be called blasphemy by some, but I believe that pi is wrong.”

That’s the opening line of a watershed essay written in 2001 by mathematician Bob Palais of the University of Utah. In “Pi is Wrong!” Palais argued that, for thousands of years, humans have been focusing their attention and adulation on the wrong mathematical constant.

Two times pi, not pi itself, is the truly sacred number of the circle, Palais contended. We should be celebrating and symbolizing the value that is equal to approximately 6.28 – the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its radius – and not to the 3.14’ish ratio of its circumference to its diameter (a largely irrelevant property in geometry).

Last year, Palais’ followers gave the new constant, 2pi, a name: tau. Since then, the tau movement has steadily grown, with its members hoping to replace pi as it appears in textbooks and calculators with tau, the true idol of math. Yesterday – 6/28 – they even celebrated Tau Day in math events worldwide.

But is pi really “wrong”? And if it is, why is tau better?

The mathematicians aren’t saying that pi has been wrongly calculated. Its value is still approximately 3.14, as it always was. Rather they argue that 3.14 isn’t the value that matters most when it comes to circles. Palais originally argued that pi should be changed to equal 6.28 while others prefer giving that number a new name altogether.

Kevin Houston, a mathematician at the University of Leeds in the U.K. who has made a YouTube video to explain all the advantages of tau over pi, said the most compelling argument for tau is that it is a much more natural number to use in the fields of math involving circles, like geometry, trigonometry and even advanced calculus.

“When measuring angles, mathematicians don’t use degrees, they use radians,” Houston enthusiastically told Life’s Little Mysteries, a sister site to LiveScience. “There are 2pi radians in a circle. This means one quarter of a circle corresponds to half of pi. That is, one quarter corresponds to a half. That’s crazy. Similarly, three quarters of a circle is three halves of pi. Three quarters corresponds to three halves!”

“Let’s now use tau,” he continued. “One quarter of a circle is one quarter of tau. One quarter corresponds to one quarter! Isn’t that sensible and easy to remember? Similarly, three quarters of a circle is three quarters of tau.” Making tau equal to the full angular turn through a circle, he said, is “so easy and would prevent math, physics and engineering students from making silly errors.”

**A better teaching tool**

Aside from preventing errors, as Palais put it in his article, “The opportunity to impress students with a beautiful and natural simplification has turned into an absurd exercise in memorization and dogma.”

Indeed, other tau advocates have said they’ve noticed a significant improvement in the ability of students to learn math, especially geometry and trigonometry where factors of 2pi show up the most, when the students learn with tau rather than pi.

Though 2pi appears much more often in calculations than does pi by itself (in fact, mathematicians often accidentally drop or ad that extra factor of 2 in their calculations), “there is no need for pi to be eradicated,” Houston said. “You might say I’m not anti-pi, I’m pro-tau. Hence, anyone could use pi when they had a calculation involving half of tau.”

Tau, the 19th letter of the Greek alphabet, was chosen independently as the symbol for 2pi by Michael Hartl, physicist and mathematician and author of “The Tau Manifesto,” and Peter Harremoës, a Danish information theorist. In an email, Houston explained their choice: “It looks a bit like pi and is the Greek ‘t,’ so fits well with the idea of turn. (Since tau is used in angles you can talk about one quarter turn and so on.)”

Pi is too ingrained in our culture and our math to succumb to tau overnight, but the movement pushes ever onward. “Change will be incremental,” Houston said.

*{LiveScience.com/Matzav.com Newscenter}*

What about the area of a circle? Would that become .5(pi)r squared?

who cared enough to post this?

Tanach, the Gemora, and the Meforshim use the ratio of the circumference to the diameter (that is, pi), NOT to the radius (2 pi), in describing the circle.

Tanach and the Gemora (see for example Eruvin 13b), use 3 for pi; Rashi uses 3.1, and Tosefos uses 3.14.

I believe the Vilna Gaon had an elegant definition of pi, which was accurate to many decimal places.

Pie are round.

Biscuits are squared.

to number 2

“gh who cared enough to post this”

you must know absolutely nothing!!!!! about math if you could post a comment like that!

Rambam approximates pi as 22/7 which is accurate to 4 decimal places.

Considering that we as children spend the better part of 12 years or more in school considering mathematics, I would have to tell commenter number 2 that this is a very special and interesting topic to me and likely to many people who have any inclination for making a just universe where numbers and measures really do matter. The Jewish bible discusses measures and balances quite a number of times. Torah ties into numbers and measurements.

The Vilna Gaon’s approximation for Pi ia 333/106.

I never realized that our Rabbis of the past has such an interest in mathematics. This is a whole new awakening for me. That is a great number to remember, AC (number 8). This is a great nation that it pursues the leadership of working about Hashem’s formulas and calculations.