New British Libel: Yerushalayim Traffic Light Bias Against Arabs


traffic-light-yerushalayimThe Economist, with Al Jazeera hot on its heels, has dug up a new Israeli villain: traffic lights.  This joins aphrodisiac bubble gum, poisonous candy, super rats, and assassins in Israel’s purported arsenal of tools

to oppress Arabs.

According to a March 6, 2010 article in the mainstream British news magazine, traffic lights in Jerusalem “flick green only briefly for cars from Palestinian districts while staying green for cars from Jewish settlements for minutes.”

When pressed by CAMERA to provide evidence for this wild charge, the Economist provided a list of intersections at which drivers from Arab neighborhoods are allegedly forced to wait at long red lights to make way for those from Jewish neighborhoods. Shortly afterwards – coincidentally, or not – Al Jazeera English broadcast a short news segment purportedly demonstrating the discrimination at one of the intersections named by the Economist.

A CAMERA field investigation reveals that the Economist and Al Jazeera claims are absurdly false – the latest examples of how even the most benign irritations encountered in quotidian life are manipulated to demonize the Jewish state. In fact, the discrepancy between the timing of red and green lights is related, as in cities across the world, to street size and traffic flow, affecting cars from both Arab and Jewish neighborhoods equally.

Beit Hanina Junction

The Economist’s first example was an intersection in northern Jerusalem near the Arab neighborhoods of Shuafat and Beit Hanina and the predominantly Jewish neighborhoods of Neve Yaakov and Pisgat Zeev. This same area was the subject of the Al Jazeera feature.

According to the Economist, traffic lights for cars approaching Jerusalem from the Arab areas remained green for 18 seconds, while traffic from the Jewish neighborhoods toward Tel Aviv enjoy the benefit of a one-minute-and-30-second green light.

This comparison is highly disingenuous, as it does not compare apples to apples.

The image to the right shows the neighborhoods mentioned by the Economist. The intersection best matching the magazine’s description is shown in the highlighted square.

The road from Pisgat Zeev and Neve Yaakov to Tel Aviv is Route 1, a major thoroughfare that crosses Israel. Traffic on this busy highway naturally has priority at junctions with smaller roads such as Derech Shua’fat, which comes south to Route 1 from the Arab neighborhoods of Shuafat and Beit Hanina.

A more apt equivalent to Derech Shua’fat at this intersection is Rechov Sheshet Hayamim, the road leading north to Route 1 from the Jewish neighborhoods of Givat Hamivtar and Ramat Eshkol. At this intersection, travelers encounter similar wait times to those on Derech Shuafat – a green light for 16 seconds and a red light for one minute and 41 seconds.

Another comparable intersection can be found less than two kilometers to the west, at the junction of the road from the Jewish neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo and Route 1. Here, motorists encounter a much shorter green light then do those at the Derech Shuafat intersection.

Clearly, then, the discrepancy between red- and green-light times at the intersection is a function of road size and not ethnicity. Traffic on larger roads have priority over smaller roads that intersect it, whether those roads are from the Arab neighborhoods or Jewish neighborhoods.

Of course, the major arteries into downtown Jerusalem are open to all travelers. Motorists from the Arab neighborhoods are certainly able to use any of the larger roads crossing Route 1. For example, it is a mere half kilometer detour for Beit Hanina residents opting to skip the allegedly-racist traffic light by using the overpass highway crossing Route 1 (Route 60/Derech Ha’aluf Uzi Narkis).

Wadi Joz Junction

The same applies for the other intersections cited by the Economist as evidence that Jerusalem traffic lights discriminate.

The magazine claims that cars exiting the Arab neighborhood of Wadi Joz to the main highway into downtown Jerusalem encounter a green light for 17 seconds and a red light for one minute and 30 seconds. They compare this to a one-minute-20-second green light for travelers from Ma’aleh Adumim.

Again, the Wadi Joz junction is an intersection between a smaller road and a large east-west thoroughfare. It is to be expected, then, that the larger road from Ma’aleh Adumim, which serves a community with three times the population as Wadi Joz, has longer green lights.

The more analogous comparison to the traffic from Wadi Joz is the traffic on the road reaching the same intersection from Hebrew University’s Mount Scopus campus on the opposite side. The motorists on that road – mostly Jews – fare worse than those from Wadi Joz. They encounter a green light for only eight seconds and a red light for two minutes and 12 seconds.

Abu Tor Junction

The Economist also claims that for cars exiting the Arab part of Abu Tor, the lights remain green for five seconds and red for one minute and 20 seconds.

What they don’t mention is that the Jewish population of Abu Tor uses the very same roads to exit the neighborhood. When these roads meet Derech Hebron/Route 60, one of the busiest roads in the city, both Jews and Arabs encounter the same red lights.

Indeed, every street that connects to Derech Hebron has a very short green light. From northern Abu Tor, lights are green for 8 seconds and red for one minute 32 seconds. From southern Abu Tor, they are green for 8 seconds and red for one minute 10 seconds. From the Jewish neighborhood of East Talpiot, they are green for 9 seconds and red for one minute 30 seconds. And from the Jewish neighborhoods of Arnona and Ramat Rachel, they are green for 7 seconds and red for one minute 16 seconds.

Arab Business District

The same Route 60 causes the delay for cars exiting eastern Jerusalem’s Arab commercial district toward western Jerusalem, which the Economist cites as further proof of anti-Arab discrimination. As mentioned above, this major road – one, by the way, heavily trafficked by Arab cars – takes precedence over smaller roads.

Further demonstration of this non-discriminatory traffic pattern is seen at a nearby intersection on Route 60. Cars approach the intersection on one side from the Jewish neighborhoods of Mea She’arim (Moshe Sacks St.) and on the other side from the predominantly Arab neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah (Van Paassen St). Both encounter a 15-second green light and a one-minute-23-second red light.

Clearly, the Economist’s allegation that Arabs are impeded because “traffic lights flick green only briefly for cars from Palestinian districts while staying green for cars from Jewish settlements for minutes” is specious.

We provided Economist editors with this documentation. It remains to be seen whether they will correct their slanderous misrepresentation.

Al Jazeera

Unsurprisingly, Al Jazeera bombarded viewers with additional outrageous fabrications. Reporter Jacky Rowland alleged:

The settlers journey to work will soon be even easier, because the municipality is building a tramway for them. The rail lines have robbed the Palestinians of two lanes of traffic.

The absurdity and hypocrisy of this charge is dumbfounding. The tramway is not being built for “settlers,” but for all Jerusalem’s residents, both Jewish and Arab. In fact, there will be numerous stations serving Arab neighborhoods. This is precisely why it “robs” Palestinians of traffic lanes – just as it robs Jews of traffic lanes where the rail is being built in Jewish neighborhoods.

{Camera/Yair Israel}


  1. The fact that they even study such things shows you how crazy and anti-Semitic they are. I think everyone should pass this around

  2. The reason for this blood libel is quite obvious look at the headline right next this, about how the tel aviv mayor says that the torah is chas vichalila making charedim ignorant, well make unfounded blood libells against the torah, and Hashem will make arabs claim fabricated blood libells against jewish treatment of arabs. Lets bear in mind that for an arab its only natural to lie and so whats the big deal in this.

  3. Let’s not get hysterical

    1) This is definitely an Anti- Israel article
    2) It is NOT Anti-Semetism
    3) It is NOT a Blood libel

    People trying to align all these concepts together, end up diluting the meaning of each and blurring the distinction. It relegates these REAL issues to comunity catch phrases

  4. what do you think anti-israel is if not antisemitism? Do you see the PA having problems with any other country?

  5. Anti-Israel does not necessarily equate with anti-Semitism.

    My Gentile neighbour will do anything possible for my family and for me, including acting as an honorary and unpaid ‘shabbes goy’. In fact, he is proud to tell other people that he does so.

    But – and this is a big but – he is vehemently against the State of Israel, its institutions, and all that it stands for.

    When asked about this apparent difference he says that while he holds Jews and their religion in the highest esteem, he feels that the State of Israel is an intrusion into the Middle East. Go figure.

    I therefore suggest that there is a definite difference between “anti-Israel” and “anti-Semitic”.

  6. If they don’t like it – they can leave or provide their own infrastructure.
    Bottom line – as long as there will be media coverage by ‘respectable media outlets’ – there will be outlandish accusations.