Report: Hillary Became Physically Violent On Election Night and Tore into Mook and Podesta

23

The Gateway Pundit reports that radio host Todd Kincannon from The Kincannon Show tweeted yesterday that a CNN reporter told him Hillary that Clinton became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight last Tuesday as the presidency was slipping away.

The following is the text of Kincannon’s tweet:

The Kincannon Show @kincannon_show
CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained.
3:39 PM – 14 Nov 2016

Hillary Clinton did not make it on stage that night. She sent John Podesta out instead.

Kincannon writes that Hillary was drunk.

Here is another tweet from Kincannon:

She was. I posted about that too. She was in a “psychotic drunken rage” according to my reporter friend. Doctor added sedatives to the mix. https://twitter.com/cobra478/status/798353578620428288 …
9:35 PM – 14 Nov 2016
820 820 Retweets 565 565 likes

The reporter said CNN would not publish the story:

The CNN reporter didn’t fail to report it. His editors will not let him. CNN has banned all “Hillary in the bunker” stories. https://twitter.com/Jean_de_Valette/status/798357468040441856 …
9:52 PM – 14 Nov 2016

{Matzav.com}

23 COMMENTS

  1. Aha.
    And it was this machsheifa and her freinds in the corrupt DNC controlled media that kept on saying that Donald Trump didn’t have the right temperament to be President.
    EXCUSE ME?
    Can you just imagine if this drug induced lady would of gotten to the highest position in the land?

  2. The website this story was taken from has zero credibility. And as biased as CNN and other mainstream media has been, there’s no way they’d violate a key tenet of journalism by “ban[ning] all ‘Hillary in the bunker‘ stories”.

  3. is this the same hillary clinton that accused trump of being “temperamentally unfit” to be president as well as being unstable with the nuclear codes? hmmm! isn’t this like the kettle calling the pot black?

  4. To the first Anonymous commenter,

    You said: “there’s no way they’d violate a key tenet of journalism by “ban[ning] all ‘Hillary in the bunker‘ stories”.

    Not true. Wikileaks has revealed numerous emails showing how CNN reporters gave Hillary debate questions and tips beforehand as well as Clinton aides and officials reviewing CNN articles on Hillary before being published by CNN.

    CNN (like the rest of the liberal mainstream media) is protecting Hillary like none other. Just because they’re a big name news network doesn’t mean they’re telling the truth, as well saw from this election.

    • What Donna Brazile did, giving Hillary the debate questions in advance, was a major ethical violation and was inexcusable. However, CNN did in fact fire her for her actions.
      Journalists, as a whole, take their profession very seriously. They believe that they have a sacred duty (yes, they take it that seriously) to tell the truth and to do so fearlessly. While individual reporters (like Brazile) may commit ethical violations and anyone can have their own personal biases and viewpoints taint their articles, it’s wildly unlikely that a major worldwide news organization like CNN would squelch a significant story in its entirety the way this article claimed they did.

  5. I agree with number two. No matter how much you dislike H and I dislike her a lot, people must excersize their common sense with regard to sensational unproven news regardless of who it is about. It is harmful for everyone when we give credence to false malicious news sources. You never know when it is your or your community’s turn to be their victim.

    H is bad enough on her own. No need to hold the lily.

    • It is a known fact that when her husband, Bill, was the President and the Monica story came to light, Hillary threw a lampshade from the White House at him. The secret service has revealed that on numerous occasions, Hillary has expressed anger in a physically violent way. You can keep your head in the sand but it won’t change the facts on the ground. Hillary Clinton does not have the proper temperament to be the leader of the free world.

  6. Hilliry doesn’t drink. There is no pictures or audio, all fabricated. If she would of gone to the ohel of the rebbe everything would be diffent.

    • yeah she does. i was at a private party with her and she was so drunk Bill had to leave early with her. shes a big time alchoholic

  7. Last Shabbos by the kiddush in the Chabad of Chappaqua, Hillary kept sneaking in and gulping from a large bottle of old Williamsburg until the Shamash had to kick her out.

  8. Irrelevant. She will not run again for president. And the physically threatening part, frankly, I don’t believe, she is not Mike Tyson. Not by far.

    • Irrelevant? Hillary might or might not be gone from the public scene, but her voters are still here. Her voters need a lesson in how shamelessly lying the main stream media and the Democratic machine are. Did you learn your lesson? Will you stop believing the main stream media? Will you stop voting for DemocRats?

  9. Her reputation of getting violent in the White House is no secret. It was a punishment for a secret service agent to be assigned to her quarters, even worse if she was around. Certainly “temperamentally unfit” to be president. Period.

LEAVE A REPLY