Ron Paul Reissues Preposterous Claims That American Policy Is To Blame For 9/11


ron-paulPresidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul reiterated his controversial stance Sunday that some policies of the United States contributed to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

Speaking on the CBS program “Face the Nation,” Paul said his views were consistent with analysis from various groups.

“I think there’s an influence,” Paul said. “That’s exactly what the 9/11 Commission said. That’s what the DoD has said. That’s also what the CIA has said. That’s what a lot of researchers have said.”

Paul said American intervention in foreign nations was a trigger to potential terrorists, who he said were sending the message: “We don’t like American bombs to be falling on our country.”

He cited withdrawing a military base from Saudi Arabia immediately after 9/11 as an indication that U.S. military policy was partly responsible for the actions of terrorists.

Paul has previously said that the military presence in Saudi Arabia was a motivator for terrorists, who were angered by American troops in the Islamic country.

The Texas congressman made clear he did not think America’s form of government and economy were to blame, but rather the specific foreign policies pursued by the United States.

“To deny this I think is very dangerous, but to argue the case that they want to do us harm because we’re free and prosperous I think is a very, very dangerous notion because it’s not true,” Paul said.

He continued, “You’re supposed to be able to criticize your own government without saying you’re un-American.”

{Political Ticker/ Newscenter}


  1. In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court almost unanimously ruled in favor of the Farmers’ Union claims that American banks were fraudulently foreclosing on farms with collusion of the government, and that the income tax amendment was never properly ratified. An extremely strict gag order was placed on everyone directly involved, court case records sealed, and docket number case details revised until after the Court’s reformation rulings are accomplished.

    To implement reformations, five Justices spent years negotiating ‘Accords’ with U.S. government and other parties. Because the Accords process did not work, the Justices authorized the reformations be put into the form of a law named the National Economic Security And Reformation Act (NESARA) which was passed secretly in March 2000. Secrecy was maintained by revising official records and strict gag orders. News of NESARA came out of U.S. naval intelligence in June 2000.

    The World Court ruled 2002 08 22 that the countries involved (182 now, including CANADA) MUST honor their contracts and change their banking systems in alignment with the true NESARA law as previously agreed.

    The process must (should) begin in the United States – in a climate of peace: once it is announced there, the other countries must follow their lead.

    NESARA was to be announced at 10 a.m. EDT on 11th September, 2001. The attacks on the World Trade Centre occurred just before 9 am that day. There were NO hijackers. President Bush desperately needed a war – partly to stop this announcement! The lives of NY firemen could be at risk as they evidenced the murder of some 200 bank employees who were actioning bank procedures for the implementation of NESARA that very morning!

    On 2002 10 14, the Justices removed many gag orders, and talk shows on both radio and television across the country began to feature this information for the first time.

    In November 2003 activities moved to a different front, with individuals and groups taking a role in the preparation for this “Golden Age” despite a wave of increasing cynicism from those who were disappointed at the long wait and those who still thought it “pie in the sky” – and, of course, also from those who would be removed from control over the planet upon its implementation …..

    By April 2005 things began to really heat up and the Illuminati tried many desperate measures in an attempt to derail the announcement – maniacal at times, such as using nuclear (hydrogen) explosions to destroy the whole world, if they could not control it. …

  2. American policy is about as much to blame for 911 as Jews were to blame for the Inquisition because they wore beards and maybe kippahs in the Spanish Iberian Peninsula.

  3. His claims are not perposterous at all. They are quite true. What we do has consequences. When the U.S. acts in a certain way to protect its interests, we need to expect that others affected by those actions will react – sometimes dangerously.

    Acknowledge that reality. Then you can discuss whether the benefits of our involvements around the world are worth the costs that result. That is a legitimate discussion. But saying that we can do what we want and nobody is going to have a problem or try to do anything about it is false and dangerous.

  4. #3, No a better example would be that Jews were responsible for the inquisition becasue they refused to accept J.
    Of course what Paul is saying is true, so what? that doesnt mean it is ok for arabs to fly planes into our buildings or for xians to burn us for rejecting their beleifs.
    #4, excellent well articualted point. Its weird to me that something so simple can be lost on so many.

  5. 3. Comment from beethoven’s friend
    November 21, 2011 at 12:25 PM

    American policy is about as much to blame for 911 as Jews were to blame for the Inquisition because they wore beards and maybe kippahs in the Spanish Iberian Peninsula.

    For once I actually agree with this commenter.

  6. Read between the lines! It’s the Jews & Israel’s fault! OWS was right! You see, this is the same old Anti Semetic mantra thats been going on for years! If we could only get rid of the Jews once & for all, the world would be perfect! Kumbaya!