Rubashkin Case Wins 2010 White Collar Crime Award


rubashkin1Each year, the White Collar Crime Professor Blog has honored individuals and organizations for their work in the white collar crime arena by bestowing “The Collar” on those who deserve praise, scorn, acknowledgment, blessing, curse, or whatever else might be appropriate.

The Collars for 2010:

The Collar for the Least Read Piece of Legislation By Congress – The Dodd-Frank Act.

The Collar for the Most Read Piece of Legislation By Corporate Counsel- The whistleblower provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act.

The Collar for Best Legislating from the Bench – The Supreme Court Justices who held in the Skilling decision that the honest services statute of mail fraud should be read to include bribery and kickbacks.

The Collar for the Best Rube Goldberg Maze – The Supreme Court Justices who failed in the Skilling decision to explain what will constitute bribery and kickbacks.

The Collar for Recognizing the Best Invention of the Year – To Justice Scalia for his concurring opinion in Skilling.

The Collar for the Gun Used Most Often in Corporate Hold-ups – The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The Collar for Second Chances Sometimes Don’t Make A Difference- To Greg Reyes who was convicted in a retrial.

The Collar for Wanna-Be An Economic Stimulus to the Legal Profession – To the defendant formerly known as Sir Allen Stanford.

The Collar for “You Want It When?” – To Lloyd’s of London for successfully avoiding further payment of defense costs to the criminal defendants in U.S. v. Stanford, et al. Note to corporate executives and boards: Remember to read the fine print before purchasing that D&O Policy.

The Collar for Missing the Boat – To the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for dragging its feet on the robo-signing fraud. The OCC gives new meaning to the term “light-touch.”

The Collar for Better Late Than Never – To the prosecutors who finally dismissed charges in the Enron Barge prosecution

The Collar for Singing the Best Version of Going In the Right Direction – To AG Holder for his memo that recognizes that sentencing should be based on an individual assessment

The Collar for Shirley Jackson Traditonalism – To the Department of Justice for thwarting all efforts to reform Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 16. The new DOJ has improved considerably under Mr. Holder, but still finds it hard to jettison a rigged system.

The Collar for Boosting the Incomes of Former AUSA & US Attorneys – BP

The Collar for Most in Need of Hearing Aid Batteries- To all of the federal circuit court judges who continue to reverse district court downward variances on dubious procedural and substantive grounds.

The Collar for the Most Likely to Have its Theme Song “I Won’t Back Down” – The Department of Justice, for trying to “fix” honest services.

The Collar for Being Fired Twice – To Rod Blagojevich for being impeached and fired on Celebrity Apprentice.

The Collar for Invited Error – To Justice Alito for his comments during President Obama’s State of the Union address.

The Collar for the “Best Offense may NOT be a Defense” – To Steve Rattner for writing a book about his tenure as President Obama’s car czar while under investigation by New York Attorney General Cuomo. Rattner still got slapped with a lawsuit by the state.

The Collar for Much Ado About Nothing – To the Department of Justice for devoting precious prosecutorial resources to insider trading and so-called foreign corrupt practices–activities that arguably shouldn’t be illegal in the first place–while ignoring financial institution accounting irregularities that helped fuel the biggest recession since the 1930s.

The Collar for the Case Most Needing Review – Sholom Rubashkin’s 27 year sentence.

The Collar for Getting it Right – To SEC Inspector General H. David Kotz for his hard hitting, spot-on report detailing the SEC’s failure to adequately investigate or regulate R. Allen Stanford.

{Law Professors/}


  1. Terrible and misleading title! Rubashkin got the award for the “Case Most Needing Review,” meaning that the judge erred in her decision. Yur title “Rubashkin wins 2010 White Collar Crime Award” implies he is guilty as charged. Please change accordingly.