Rubbish: Scientists Rebut White House Global Warming Claims


global-warming-climate-changeA group of independent scientists, economists, and meteorologists has issued a pointed response to the scientific foundation of the Obama administration’s claims that humans are drastically changing the climate by burning fossil fuels.

With expertise in multiple disciplines, including climate research, weather modeling, physics, geology, statistical analysis, engineering, and economics, the 15 signers make the case that the foundation of the White House National Climate Assessment (NCA) is a “masterpiece of marketing” that crumbles like a “house of cards” under the weight of real-world evidence.

“They promote their ‘Climate Models’ as a reliable way to predict the future climate. But these models dramatically fail basic verification tests. Nowhere do they admit to these well-known failures. Instead, we are led to believe that their climate models are close to perfection,” assert the scientists.

The 829-page NCA report was released on May 6 and was characterized by administration officials as “the most comprehensive, authoritative, transparent scientific report on U.S. climate change impacts ever generated.”

The administration seized on the NCA findings as justification for its push to further regulate the fossil-fuel industry and to bolster alternative green-energy sources.

The scientists’ rebuttal, however, strongly challenges the theory of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW), which it says is “based on a string of inferences that begins with the assumptions” that human burning of fossil fuels is driving up atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and “is so grossly flawed it should play no role in U.S. Energy Policy Analyses and CO2 regulatory processes.”

The scientists do not have any affiliation with any particular organization and have worked together pro bono for several years.

Read more at NEWSMAX.

{ Newscenter}


  1. I don’t have to be a small log on a short fire to really understand that its very likely that global energy expenditure can effect global climate. The anti-climate change folks can run all they want and shoot away. I am going to hedge my license of human interest to bring the forces of human development to a better form in my voting pattern when I elect those who will be more contentious against the really scary bet that there will indeed be a climate catastrophe in the future. Modify the energy expenditure. Since we CAN do things to improve the environment, we MUST consider that to be essential.

    Those with interests in maintaining the future in such a way that interest is lost on changing climate risks and the sine-qua-non of coal and gasoline burning futures is not a limited matter.

    These people who want to fight the reality of a changing global climate knowledge level are criminals and they are not a friend of anyone who wants to see their children and their children’s children grow up in a sensible world.

    Where are the voices of liberty? They are not the ones holding the smoke stack as the future.

    Never Again.

  2. The National Climate Assessment was written by 20 times as many scientists. But even these 15 experts agree that the climate HAS changed, particularly in the Arctic. Hopefully this will silence the ignoramuses who say that climate change is a hoax. It is real; the question is what to do about it.

  3. Hey, guess what? The ice caps on Mars are melting, and Jupiter’s red spot is shrinking.

    When will these fools understand Who controls the climate?

  4. News flash for Charlie Hall and his fellow fearmongerers: Climate always has changed, always does change, and always will change!

    Why are there climate “change” cycles? Because that is the way the Aibishter wills it.

    Global Warming is a HOAX because mankind does NOT control the climate: Only the Aibishter does!

    Anyone that truly believes that more government spending is the path towards making climate stay the same is truly the ignoramus.

  5. “Global Warming is a HOAX because mankind does NOT control the climate”

    I hope for your sake you don’t live near sea level.

    But in any case, your argument would apply equally well to diseases. Should you refuse antibiotic treatment? Organ transplants? Heart disease drugs? The Aibishter degreed disease how dare you interfere!

    The Aibishter decreed all the fires in California. Should we let them burn uncontrolled?

    The Aibishter allows us to modify our environment. Your interpretation is NOT a Jewish one.

    And BTW I hope you don’t mind a hundred million homeless Muslims from Bangladesh getting refuge near you when the sea level rise puts that entire country underwater. This is a national security issue, as the Center for Naval Analyses military advisory board pointed out recently. And CNA is no left wing organization.