Scientific Paper Stating The Human Hand Was Designed By A ‘Creator’ Sparks Controversy


A recent scientific paper on the movement of the human hand has faced strong criticism for referring to a ‘Creator’ throughout, THE INDEPENDENT reports.

The paper, titled: ‘Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living’ was written by a team of four researchers, three from Huazhong University in China, and one from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts.

Published in the PLOS ONE journal, the fairly conventional study looked at the mechanics of how we grasp things, and involved the measurement of the hand movements of 30 participants.

THE INDEPENDENT reports that members of the scientific community have demanded the paper be retracted, for its several perceived references to the pseudoscientific theory of intelligent design and a possibly divine ‘Creator.’

In the opening sentences of the study, it claims the link between muscles and hand movements is the product of “proper design by the Creator.”

Later, it says human hand coordination “should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention,” and concludes by again claiming the mechanical architecture of the hand is the result of “proper design by the Creator.”

The multiple references to intelligent design in a journal like PLOS ONE have stoked anger in the scientific community, and many people, including researchers who work as editors for the publication, are now calling for it to be retracted.

Chalilah for them to simply admit to a Creator!





  1. Yad means hand, the gematria tells us the boiray haolum created the hand and that we should have to Of them

  2. Sure. If there is a Creator, He is entitled to make demands. That is unacceptable to the scientific community. They are happier thinking they came from monkeys.

  3. This is very comical. In all reality, G-d is of course real.

    But to put G-d into a scientific study is very silly. The world is pretty sure we have a bible. We are quite sure we have synagogues and tefilling and tzitzits.

    There is no universal doubt that a Creator exists.

    But the scientific mind must separate the religious from his scientific endeavor when reporting a method or a reality that can be proven.

    I can myself attest of course that G-d is real. I live in too much fear of G-d to say otherwise.

    But the world must find that a revealed “Creator” in a scientific journal is not G-d blessed by simply a madness of an over reaching scientist trying to prove that G-d is real for the fear of his own devil.

    Its comical. Some may think a triumph for good over evil. But the real evil is that the science will be deemed stupid and the scientist no longer in full repentance.

    Still, count this as a laugh for the ages. The Chinese might be onto something. They fear more than G-d when Communism dictates their value and community must be stolen for a broken aim of hate.

    Scary times of course, but if Donald Trump admits there is a Creator, will he ever dream that he has a repentance that is due? Clearly we must find more blessings today.

    Funny story.