Watch: Governor Of Virginia Claims That 93 Million People Are Killed A Day Due To Gun Violence

31

For the record, he corrected himself after being challenged about the veracity of his statement.
WATCH:


{Matzav}

31 COMMENTS

  1. Guns don’t kill. It’s people behind the guns who kill. If they don’t have guns they use knives, screwdrivers and other tools.

    It’s governors like you and other authority who are to blame for the murder. You allow liberal lawlessness and anarchy to run wild for decades with rowdy protests and chopping the head off a President without penalties with the encouragement of the media, and then you come crying.

      • Dynamite is commonly used by miners and sometimes in construction. Guns are used for self defense. That is for defense of law abiding citizens against crazed DemocRats such as the Bernie supporter who mass murdered people at the baseball game.

  2. Cars also kill people as we see happening across Europe. Why doesn’t the phony Clinton member give that speech on the Streets of Chicago?

  3. Fact: Mr Terrorist wasn’t mentally disturbed. He loved all republicans. He didn’t think he would get killed, he thought he’s just going for a pop shot. Without the gun he would just hug the republicans. It has nothing to do with the vitriol and anger expressed by the democrats.

    Perhaps we should take away his car, his kitchen knives, his baseball bat, his baseball ball, his chairs, saws, screw drivers, hammers and the list goes on and on. All of these could’ve been an alternative for this lunatic! WAKE UP DEMS! SMELL YOUR HATE YOU SPEW!

  4. The guy is clearly an idiot: At that rate, it would take 2.5 months to wipe out the entire world population. Besides, it is the evil people who commit murders, and they will continue with or without guns – any vehicle, household chemicals, household tools can be turned into a deadly weapon; unless we address the actual evildoers as opposed to a methodology, nothing will be solved.

  5. ” he corrected himself after being challenged about the veracity of his statement.”

    got so he isnt a Republican

    “If they don’t have guns they use knives, screwdrivers and other tools.”

    A catchy phrase, but the evidence shows this isnt the case.
    countries with less gunsd have a lower homicide rate (although they have knives and screwdrivers. and besides, if r”l a person was going to be attacked do you prefer the attacker have a knife/screwdriver or a gun?

    • Dear ignorant sheker that has a nerve to be called emes: “evidence shows”?! What evidence?! Did you hear of islamonazis using vehicles and kitchen knives to commit mass murders in your dear gun-free Europe, or is it an alternate reality on your planet? Do you realize that you have less chance of survival being hit with a truck at 40 mph than being shot with a gun? Do you realize that murderers and terrorists in Europe do commit mass shootings, even though guns are strictly verboten across the pond?

      • Tell it to people of Paris and London: hey you guys are completely defenseless against the islamonazis murdering you with guns, trucks, knives, corrosive chemicals, etc. – but you supposedly have lower homicide rates.

        • ” but you supposedly have lower homicide rates.”

          Um youre a bit confused.
          they do, in spite of recent terrorist acts

      • “That is actually sketchy”

        Except that it isnt see below

        “What evidence?!”
        so much evidence that I dont want to fill up the entire thread and dont know where to begin
        Here is one study:
        “The Relationship Between Gun Ownership and Firearm Homicide Rates in the United States, 1981–2010
        Am J Public Health. 11/13′

        “Did you hear of islamonazis using vehicles and kitchen knives to commit mass murders in your dear gun-free Europe”

        im confused, is that really your arguemnt against gun control? Look terrorists are trying to kill people wiht knives and trucks, lets give them guns?
        BTW why not give them bombs too since the argument “Besides, it is the evil people who commit murders, and they will continue with or without guns” can be used for bombs as well.

        “Do you realize that you have less chance of survival being hit with a truck at 40 mph than being shot with a gun?”

        I dont, since it depends on multiple factors, but even if true the argument more trucks = more homicide does not hold up while more guns = more homicide does (evidence provided above)

        “Do you realize that murderers and terrorists in Europe do commit mass shootings,…”

        not nearly as often as in the US

        ” even though guns are strictly verboten across the pond?”

        Hope this helps

        Again, so your argument is to make it easier for them to get guns? Youll need to walk me through that slowly please

        • A nice exercise in manipulative arguments, but it doesn’t cover up the basis of the DemocRatic immoral position: disarming the law abiding citizens while importing islamonazis and third world gang members. If you like gun control so much, why don’t you take an evening stroll through an African American neighborhood in Chicago and see how well it works.

          • “but it doesn’t cover up the basis…”

            im sorry I dont know what that means

            “why don’t you take an evening stroll through an African American neighborhood in Chicago and see how well it works.”

            I have. It worked fine.
            Though again you need to walk me through this. Chicago is an argument ofr more guns? Congrats you win Chelm logic of the year award.
            Look how much violence there is with gun control lets make it even easier to get guns. Seriously?
            Though youll have to split it with the chelmite above who argued that we should make it easier for terrorists to get guns (or bombs I guess) since if they want to kill us theyll do it anyway, so we might as well make it easier for them.

            Stop listening to Sean Hannity and think for yourself

        • Emes, on your planet, Chicago doesn’t have some of the most restrictive gun laws and some of the highest murder rates in certain neighborhoods(despite all the blabbering about gun restrictions equals less murder)?! Regarding your ingenious solution consisting of complete disarmament of the law abiding citizens for an alleged benefit of criminals encountering minor difficulties but not even closely disarming – your reasoning would make Neville Chamberlain proud. Do you even realize that gun control is a fascist big-state policy that has nothing to do with reducing crime, or are you not exactly a chess champion of your planet? Perhaps it’s time for you to acquire some critical thinking skills, as opposed to regurgitating the fascist-liberal propaganda.

          • Reread what I wrote
            I never said completely disarming. (though if that would help im for it.)

            I dont know how many guns from Chicago are bought one state over in Missouri which has one of the least restrictive gun control in the country (no waiting period, no background checks for guns bought from a “private party”) and neither do you (well you dont know much so thats an understatement)

            You say “alleged benefit of criminals encountering minor difficulties” The fact remains that we have the highest murder rate of virtually any western country yo ucan keep avoiding this issue, and calling names but sadly for you, on my planet that doesnt change the facts.
            Lets start with easy measures, Universal background checks, and those on a no-fly list should be on a no-gun list. LEt go of you cult of death loving NRA and embrace common sense meaures that maybe maybe will help save a few lives.
            How excited are you to guess where the next mass shooting wil be? A Mall? an office ooh ooh maybe a school again your cult loves dead kids dont they? and lol you probably call yourself “pro-life” Good stuff you cant make this up

          • “Emes”, you are fool of sheker: a) you portray the US firearms regulations as the Wild West style non existent – that’s a lie, we already have background checks and strict license requirements in this country. Bb

          • “Emes”, you are full of sheker: a) You portray the US firearms regulations as non existent, reminiscent of the Wild West – that’s a lie, we already have background checks and strict license requirements in this country. b) You present a legal and a criminal gun market as one and the same, which is a complete fallacy, as gang bangers and felons don’t purchase their guns and ammunition from legal sources – and there are plenty of illegal sources – if you can get a kilo of extremely illegal heroin, you can get illegal guns even easier. c) You deliberately misrepresent crime statistics by lumping together all subgroups. If you compare violent crime rates amongst the gun-allowed American white/Asian middle class versus European or Asian guns-verboten middle class, and American black and Latino violent crime rates versus gun-verboten Latin American or African countries’ slums population, then all of the gun-friendy American subgroups have much lower violent crime rates versus the guns-verboten. d) Every single dictatorship, from Medieval to 20th century’s communists and nazis, had a strict policy of no weapons except the government class. The contemporary DemocRats are a conglomerate of the big government fascists elites and their useful idiots, who do everything im their power to promote more crime and chaos, then turn around and use the chaos they themselves created as an excuse to achieve a disarmed and consequently a more helpless and obedient population – all manufactured crisis, sneaky infiltration and manipulation, as prescribed by Saul Alinsky. In fact, real liberals are much closer to conservative ideology, and are not against gun ownership – e.g. Vermont is very liberal and very gun friendly. You are on the fascist side of the political spectrum, whether you are aware or ignorant of it.

          • “you portray the US firearms regulations as the Wild West style non existent – that’s a lie, we already have background checks and strict license requirements in this country. ”

            Depends on the state. In Missouri (one state over from Illinois in which youll find Chicago) There is no background check required for buying from a private dealer.
            So some gang bangers can drive a few hours to one of the many gun shows and buy as many guns as they want no questions asked.
            THis is factual. Though You seem not to like it, which I completly agree with.

            “You present a legal and a criminal gun market as one and the same, ”

            Again, silliness if we can limit some gun detahs why not do it. Most recent mass shootings were performed with legally purchased firearms. The argument that we cant stop all deaths so lets not stop any doesnt make a lot of sense no matter how many times it is repeated.

            “You deliberately misrepresent crime statistics by lumping together all subgroups.”

            that was my mistake, I meant to include suicides too, which you guessed it is at higehr risk among gun woners (yes again some people who commit sucicie will do so without guns, that doesnt change a thing)

            Then of course there are accidental gun deaths.
            Oh and surprise surprise other countries havve “sub groups ” too and besides most of the recent mass shootings were commited by people who werent members of these “sub groups” most with legally purchased firearms, many with histroy of mental illne.
            Stop repeatign Rush Limbaugh and the NRA’s talking points. They are too easy to refute

            “Every single dictatorship, from Medieval to 20th century’s communists and nazis, ”

            They also all loved potatos. I hope you are forgoing potatos since they are loved by dicatators (hint thats why they are called dicTATORS !!!!)

            Look simple question:
            Do you beleive all guns purchased should require a background check?

  6. If he would been a Republican he would be laughed out of Congress not to mention that this dunderhead is the next Democrat Presidential candidate, How the left destroyed this country.

  7. I”m getting ready for some good deals on the real estate. With 93,000,000 being killed a day in a few days we should have very little demand so prices should go down.
    Meanwhile I’m in a bunker waiting it out

  8. Is it legal in Virginia to elect public officials who are non compos mentis (not of sound mind)? Shouldn’t there be a law that one must have at least a double digit IQ to be elected as governor? You know, just wondering.

    • Because this bum belongs to the Clintons. The Clintons own the DNC. If one doesn’t comply with a Clinton demand, they are usually found “mysteriously” dead in the local park. Why do you think, pretty girl, Loretta Lynch obstructed any case against Hillary? She wants to live, baby.

    • If you like to rely on police arriving 10 minutes after the crime and taking a report, go ahead. The rest of us would like to be able to defend ourselves against criminals and terrorists.

  9. 93 million people……………….Voted for Democrats in his state alone! Another 93 million people voted Democrat in Illinois. Another 93 million people voted Democrat in New York. Another 93 million people voted Democrat in California…………………………. etc…………………….

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here