White House Defends Interpretation Of Travel Ban Ruling


The Trump administration opposed to opening the door to grandparents from six Muslim-majority nations Monday, saying that the government’s interpretation of the scaled-down travel ban is based on immigration law.

The Supreme Court ruled last week that parts of Trump’s executive order that banned people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days can go into effect despite blocks from the lower courts. The Supreme Court said the ban cannot apply to anyone with a “bona fide relationship with a U.S. citizen or U.S. entity.

The White House clarified the Supreme Court’s wording of “bona fide relationship,” saying it manse close family members only: parents, spouses, siblings and children. Grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins would still be banned from entering the U.S.

The Justice Department argued in a court filing Monday that the government’s definition “hews closely to the categorical determinations articulated by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act,” Reuters reported.

Refugee organizations had argued in Hawaii federal court that their work to resettle refugees qualified as a “bona fide relationship” between a person of the six banned nations and a U.S. entity.

However, the U.S. said workers with offers of employment from American companies and international students were different from refuges getting help from resettlement organizations, according to Reuters.

“A refugee’s relationship with the agency flows from the government, not from an independent relationship between the refugee and the resettlement agency,” the government said. “Indeed, resettlement agencies typically do not have any direct contact with the refugees they assure before their arrival in the United States.” Read more at Fox News.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here