Why Obama’s Decision To Ask Congress About Syria Is A High-Stakes Gamble


obama-bloombergBy Chris Cillizza

President Obama’s stunning reversal on Syria – deciding to ask Congress to approve the use of force just hours after he seemed set on bypassing the legislative branch – amounts to a massive gamble by the commander in chief.

There is little certainty of the outcome of the vote, which is expected to come the week of Sept. 9 when both houses of Congress return to Washington after the August recess. And, if Congress doesn’t pass the resolution, Obama will be in an even smaller box – policy-wise – than he found himself at the end of last week following the British Parliament’s rejection of a similar use of force resolution.

Let’s start by walking through just how big a challenge President Obama has built for himself.

First, consider that roughly 40 percent of House Democrats voted against the use of force resolution against Iraq in 2002. (Unlike 2002, Democrats have one of their own in the White House now, but the 2010 election made the caucus more liberal – and more opposed to military action – than it was in 2002.)

Second, remember that Obama is in the middle of his second term. He is playing for his legacy; all – or at least the vast majority – of the Democratic members he will ask to vote in favor of striking Syria are playing for the 2014 election. Those are two very different calculations – especially when you consider that many of the Democrats whom Obama will need are running in districts where the only real threat is from their ideological left. A vote for a controversial military action is perfect fodder for a liberal challenger looking for an issue that will take down a Democratic incumbent.

Third, Obama’s relationship with Congress – including those within his party – has never been all that great. He spent little time there during his own career, and Democratic House strategists have long believed that Obama is semi-openly disdainful of the people’s House. And, having a long-time Senate aide – Denis McDonough – as his chief of staff won’t help President Obama much in the House either. (The perfect chief of staff for this moment in the House is currently serving as the mayor of Chicago.)

Fourth, the shadow of Iraq looms. You can tell how much by listening to Secretary of State John Kerry make the case for action in Syria on Friday. “Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack,” Kerry said. “And I will tell you it has done so more than mindful of the Iraq experience. We will not repeat that moment.”

Read the rest of the article at The Washington Post.

{Matzav.com Newscenter}


  1. The only reason he is going to congress is if everything goes bad he can blame some one, if congress says no, he can say it is there fault,if congress says yes and things go wrong it is the republicans fault, or at least congresses fault. Here is a president that what ever happens it is never his fault.