Analysis of the New Zealand Shechitah Ban


shechitahChanoch Kesselman, Jewish Tribune

The very disturbing news that the New Zealand government has outlawed all food animal Shechita is bound to have reverberations in other countries. The Shechita ban places New Zealand in the rogue’s gallery alongside such other “Shechita-banners” as Sweden, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Iceland, Estonia, Latvia and Croatia, which disregard the rights of Jews in preference to animal rights. Most of the countries listed apart from Switzerland have either no Jews or a very small Jewish population, but even those with a Jewish community do not have the required fortitude to present their case to their respective governments to allow Shechita. Switzerland, which has had a ban on Shechita for over one hundred years, allows the unrestricted importation of kosher meat and does permit poultry Shechita. The Swiss government claims that not to allow at least the Shechita of birds would be a total abnegation of the Swiss guarantee to allow freedom of religious practice and thus would be against the Swiss constitution.

New Zealand on the other hand, which now makes no pretence of allowing its Jewish citizens to have rights, has banned even the Shechita AND importation of kosher poultry. Poultry is not imported into New Zealand because of the fear of spreading such diseases as avian flu. Jews will be allowed to import red-meat from neighbouring Australia and if Jews wish to have a plate of chicken soup for Friday night, well, the government says it will permit the importation of chicken-stock cubes.

What makes the New Zealand ban particularly odious is the fact that it is the first democracy, since the Nazi Shechita ban in Germany in 1933, to place a total ban on all Shechita for its Jewish subjects; a first, for which the NZ government should be thoroughly ashamed. Its shame is all the greater since New Zealand was a founder of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights signed in 1948 guaranteeing religious freedom to all its citizens. It comes as no surprise that the “research” into Shechita was held at New Zealand’s Massey University which most recently has led the world in anti-Shechita “science”. (See Jewish Tribune report “Shechita Under Attack From New Zealand” 15 October 2009)

Until this ban was forced on New Zealand’s Jews, they suffered another interference from the government in the form of compulsory stunning after Shechita and this new and unprecedented total ban must be seen as a natural progression from the enforced post Shechita stunning. Before embarking on its route to ban shechita the NZ government did

give consideration to what it was doing. There were two views. One view supported the anti-shechita findings of Massey University, with no exceptions for Jews and;

“A second view holds that the rights of the New Zealand Jewish community to practise its religious beliefs accorded by the Bill of Rights Act must be balanced against animal welfare considerations…” National Animal Welfare Advisory Council.

However, the final outcome was to ignore the Bill of Rights as far as Jews are concerned. It was decided that the “welfare of animals” overrode other considerations, especially the rights of Jews because Shechita gives them cause for concern,

“Shechita, the Jewish method, is the only commercial religious slaughter procedure which raises major animal welfare concerns… No other slaughter method required by an established religious group was drawn to NAWAC’s attention”. National Animal Welfare Advisory Council.

The National Animal Welfare Advisory Council (NAWAC) is the NZ government’s advisor on animal slaughter.

It is relevant to consider the commercial aspect to the ban on Shechita in New Zealand. Kosher meat products are not exported from New Zealand so it is not an “export-dollar-producer”. On the other hand, Halal meat exports from New Zealand to the Moslem world of Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Iran and other counties account for millions of dollars worth of trade for the New Zealanders. Halal slaughter has not been affected by the Shechita ban. Here again is the government’s view which permits the continuation of Halal slaughter;

“Halal, the Muslim method, has been conducted commercially in New Zealand, with a pre-cut reversible stun, for many years and, therefore, meets an acceptable animal welfare standard. No submissions opposing the use of the pre-cut reversible stun were received from the Muslim community.”

And further;

“NAWAC requires as a minimum standard that all animals undergoing commercial slaughter be stunned effectively prior to the throat or neck cut. This applies to all commercial slaughter, including Halal slaughter (i.e. slaughter by the Muslim method) which already meets this minimum standard”. NAWAC

It must not be assumed that New Zealand’s Jews were not forthright in their opposition to the ban or events leading up to it. A few years ago the Government wanted to enlist the “cooperation” of the Jewish community to conduct “experiments” as to the humaneness of Shechita. The Community leaders, smelling a rat, asked for advice from the UK. The leading Shechita defence groups in the UK advised that this request for “cooperation” was just a front by the government to show that they are “consulting” with the Jewish community and in any case the government will do what it wants to obstruct Shechita with or without the

Jews. Here is advice which was taken up by the brave New Zealand Jews which they submitted to the Government;

“We cannot participate or in any way assist in what you propose doing on principle. Your underlying hypothesis is that Shechita is not humane, whereas there is abundant scientific evidence world-wide that it is humane and secures in single operation a stun, dispatch and draining. Shechita accomplishes what other methods of stunning attempt, namely, immediate and irreversible abolition of consciousness until death supervenes. Moreover, it is a core value of the Jewish faith that Shechita conforms with all the requirements of humaneness. Since you do not accept these assertions (that shechita is the Jewish religious-humane method) any experiment or exercise, such as the one you propose is calculated to injure or deny completely the freedom of religious belief and practice of the Jewish community.”

Although in this round the New Zealand Jewish Community may be down, they are certainly not out, there will be world-wide vigorous protests to the New Zealand government calling on them to reverse immediately their callous and clearly racist action in removing the freedom of religious practice from its Jewish community.

{Jewish Tribune}

{ Newscenter}


  1. Its terrible, and considering the fact that New Zeland has a jewish prime minister, just shows you that Liberal views against schita which is unfortunately led by jews which are calling it inhuman e.t.c. dont have care to thoroughly check the facts, and This astute claim that tsar balei chayim takes precedence over human suffering is mind boggling, to say the least.

  2. B”H

    Chanoch Kesselman has come a long way since his Portchester Road School days.

    Kol hakavod Chanoch! Hatapuach lo nofel rachok min ha’etz; your parents would have been very proud of you.


  3. The nations are lining themselves up for their place in Gehinom. Those who are not yet reverved for Gehinom are now being tested and writing their own demise. In the last period before Mosiach the world will be very dark, but then comes great light for those who cling to Hashem. “…lo yinum v’lo yeshan…”

  4. This ruling will be overturned.
    Rabbi Moshe Gutnick will not rest until Shechita in New Zealand once again has government support.
    He will be relentless is his pursuit of what surely HaShem desires.
    There is a possible silver lining to this episode.
    The organized Jewish Community in NZ irrespective of their level of observance will feel that his/her religious practices are being threatened; which may lead to a religious awakening.
    Maybe this is the Almighty’s intent

  5. One has to realize the part RSPCA plays in this both in Great Britain and New Zeland and Australia. The vegan animal rights social movement is on the move and taking away human rights in order to give rights to animals. Do not be mistaken that RSPCA is part of this. For a government to take away freedom of religion, what does that say about our government.

  6. wow! The world, as modermized and advanced as it may claim to be, has re-entered the 1930s.
    More anti jewish hatred spreads around the world.
    Expect this trend to continue. We arent in control!

  7. NZ’s PM is certainly Jewish. In fact, he is the son of a Holocaust survivor. However, he is not at all religious, has married a gentile and has two children from that marriage. He does however sometimes participate in Jewish community events.

    To allow this ban on his watch is a disgrace, and the parallels with one of Hitler’s first acts against German Jews seems to escape him. I fear like assimilated German Jews, he considers himself first a NZer and only second a Jew. Like them he is blind to the process his government is setting into motion.

    New Zealand has also just introduced the world’s most comprehensive Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) scheme – miraculously changing from a sceptical pre-election position on climate change ‘science’ to that of a leading proponent – and it is another indisputable fact that the Green movement is firmly rooted in Nazi ideology.

    No surprise that NZ has been offered a top climate change job by that bastion of Jewish rights, the United Nations (UN). While NZ is also justifying its human rights record before that bastion of human rights, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

    Of course, contravening its own Bill of Rights, raising the rights of animals above the Jews, will surely be applauded at the UNHRC. Oy vey!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here