California City to Issue $300 Fines for Not Wearing a Mask 

8

Law enforcement officers in one California city will be issuing $300 fines for those who do not wear a mask in public settings.

The West Hollywood station of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said in a statement on Twitter that it will begin issuing “administrative citations for people who are not conforming to the Order to wear a face cover/mask in public.” The fine for the first offense will be $300, which comprises a $250 fine and $50 in fees.

“Our last option was to conduct enforcement by issuing an administrative citation, but the risk to community health is too great. We ask our community to please wear a face cover/mask while in public in an effort to keep everyone healthy and control the spread of the virus,” the sheriff’s office said.

Read more at NEWSMAX.

{Matzav.com}

8 COMMENTS

  1. Can I pay by credit card? Will there be an extra processing fee? Can I use a business check? Can I use it as a business tax deduction? Will these fines be given to blacks, the superior race? Or is it only for the priviliged WHITES?

  2. Masks are useless! See What These Dr. Are Stating !
    https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses
    Abstract

    Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

    Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

    The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history. click link …

    • Where did you get the info that particles under 2.5 micron are not blocked? they are blocked very efficiently by diffusion. Larger particulate and aerosol is instead blocked by filtering. The 2.5 micron is in fact the size most difficult to block and that’s why the performance at 2.5 micron is used as a benchmark. If correctly used, N95 will block at least 95% of non-oily aerosol and particulate, N98 will block 98%, N100 will block 99.97%. If that is not enough, there are other options. If your asinine statements were true, people would drop dead in labs and in workshops, in oil rigs and at rocket launch facility, and of course, in every hospital pharmacy where chemo drugs are prepared. This information is not secret, you can not blame China or anyone else from withholding that from you. You are not wearing a mask because it’s inconvenient, because you think you look ridiculous in one, and because your feelings towards fellow Yidden is not as strong as the loyalty you feel towards President Trump.

  3. Demand they provide you with a pulse oximeter because you were told that masks are harmful.

    Taught to Believe MASKS Aren’t Harmful, Here’s Proof IT IS!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whVwxWloW2Q

    The danger of wearing a mask. Must listen:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqhwwLbNZqo
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWVA3yZjV50

    https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/face-masks-harm-children-and-some-have-even-died-california-governor-dictates-eve
    WHO (World Health Organization) states: There “is no evidence wearing a mask by a healthy person in a community setting can prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19” and further concludes “universal community masking” is ineffective at preventing “infection from respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”
    CDC states: “no significant reduction” in “transmission with the use of face

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here