A new study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds that mask mandates were linked to a decline in COVID-19 cases and deaths.
The study also found that allowing restaurant dining was linked to increases in cases and deaths.
The death growth rate was 1.9 percentage points less 81 to 100 days after a mask mandate, the study found, with smaller declines before then, starting as soon as 1 to 20 days afterwards. Case growth rates declined up to 1.8 percentage points.
On the other hand, allowing restaurant dining was linked to a 3-percentage-point increase in the death growth rate 81 to 100 days later. There were no meaningful increases until 60 days after restaurant dining was allowed. Case growth rates were about 1 percentage point higher starting 41 days after dining was allowed.
Read more at The Hill.
{Matzav.com}
This showes that we should continue following the guidance of the medical field and take All necessary precautions
This shows that Matzav are accomplices in the deaths of our brethren. Many people have brought up the lies of the CDC but Matzav censored it.
If you believe this, I have a bridge to sell you. Check out the FLCCC website and Vladimirzelenkomd website for prevention and treatment options that could end the pandemic tomorrow instead of these masks that obviously have caused the pandemic to stretch on longer than necessary.
I don’t understand the article. It says that from Dec thru March, the death rate declined 1.9 percent 81-100 days after a mask mandate. This implies that there were many “new” mandates during that period, so that we can have a before-and-after scenario to arrive at a percentage decrease. So tell me, where exactly was it in the US that there was no mask mandate (and people were not wearing masks), and a “new” mandate was introduced somewhere between Dec and March? You know where? Nowhere! Virtually all of the US (except maybe Florida, where no new mandate was introduced either) has been under mask mandates since late summer and well before that.
Furthermore, this “study” inadvertently details exactly why no mask mandate should be in place. Government only may introduce things like masking and social distancing to prevent overflowing the acute medical systems. 1.9 percent is not a factor in overfilling hospitals, etc., and thus should not be in effect now or ever.
Update: Now I understand the article (earlier I commented here that I don’t get the article at all). WND.com (a less left-leaning news site often sourced by Matzav) is reporting that the general consensus now, which is illustrated by overlay graphs posted on Twitter, show virtually no correlation between mask-wearing or not and Covid-19 increases/decreases. So the lying left had to come up with something to bolster their stupid policies, and they came up, via the willing leftists reporters at The Hill, with this 1.9% nonsense.