
Monday night’s leaked Supreme Court draft to unravel the landmark Roe v. Wade decision on abortion appears not only to be authentic, but a deliberate attempt to “pressure” the justices, constitutional law expert Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax.
“This has the sign of authenticity,” Dershowitz told Monday’s “Rob Schmitt Tonight.” “It also to me, and this is just a theory, but I think it’s maybe correct: The leak was very deliberately – perhaps by a law clerk who was very strongly opposed to reversing Roe v. Wade – seeking to make it public now so that pressure could be put on the Supreme Court, either by an act of Congress to pack the court, or an act of Congress making a federal legislative right of every woman to have an abortion based on the Commerce Clause.”
Dershowitz, who has 57 years’ experience with the Supreme Court, having been a clerk and a Harvard Law professor, added that “in all the years I’ve been following the Supreme Court, there’s never been a leak like this.”
“But this was not just an inadvertent leak,” Dershowitz told host Rob Schmitt as the news was breaking from the Politico-leaked draft. “I think this was an act of civil disobedience engaged in by a determined law clerk who thought it was so serious that a woman’s right to abortion will be taken away that they were willing to risk their bar, their career, their heritage on this, because this is going to be investigated.”
The leaker – potentially trying to be a “hero of the left” – Politico, and the reporter are sure to be investigated amid an unprecedented set of circumstances, according to Dershowitz.
“The FBI is going to be called in,” he continued. “There’s going to be an attempt to break the journalist privilege. There’s going to be an attempt to call Politico and demand of them that they reveal the source.
“Politico won’t do it, but the case may go all the way to the Supreme Court on that issue as well.”
Dershowitz noted Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, his own law student, has to be frustrated he has lost control amid years of partisan attacks on the independence and balance of the court.
“This is a monumental day,” Dershowitz said. “Chief Justice Roberts is just so upset, I can imagine, because he’s lost control. People will think, at least, he’s lost control of the court.”
While the leaker might become a “hero of the left,” Dershowitz said, adding, if revealed, “they won’t be practicing law anymore.”
“They will be disbarred if this comes to light, and we may never know who leaked it, but we may find out, and that person will lose her or his career but will become a hero to the left,” Dershowitz said. “So it’s a very important day in Supreme Court history.
“It will also result in a tightening up of the hiring of law clerks and making it explicitly a crime to reveal information from the inner workings of the Supreme Court. In all my years of following the Supreme Court and being a professor, nothing like this has ever occurred.”
Dershowitz, knowing the writings of Justice Samuel Alito – who wrote the draft majority opinion that was leaked – said there is just a 2% chance this is a “fake” news report.
“There’s a 2% chance there’s no truth to this – that somebody created a fake story – but I can’t imagine that Politico would risk its reputation,” Dershowitz said.
Ultimately, “the dignity of the Supreme Court in the United States,” Dershowitz said, “suffered a terrible blow today.”
“The argument is really about the power of the Supreme Court to change 50 years of law simply based on new justices being appointed, and that’s going to be upsetting to Stare Decisis – the concept that you leave the law alone unless there are compelling reasons for changing,” Dershowitz concluded.
© 2022 Newsmax




“The leaker…, Politico, and the reporter are sure to be investigated…., according to Dershowitz.”
I disagree with Dershowitz. There will be no serious investigation, because the Dems will not conduct one. And I’m not sure Roberts cares about the leak, because I’m not sure he is in favor of overturning Roe vs Wade; it’s too much for him to handle. If the leak makes it more difficult for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe, Roberts will probably be happy with that; any bit of public pressure, and media/left-wing critique that he is relieved of, he will greatly appreciate.
Dershowitz is wrong. Jonathan Peters, a journalism and law professor in Georgia, just Tweeted a long list of examples of leaks from the Supreme Court. Ironically, one of the leaks were both the deliberations and decision of Roe vs. Wade itself. The worst was the Dred Scott decision, leaked by no less a figure than President Buchanan two days before the decision; Buchanan had been pressuring the Justices to agree to an activist pro-slavery majority opinion, and they did.
It’s too bad your mother didn’t abort you.
sick, unwarranted comment. If you have nothing to add to the conversation don’t write anything.
Triggered by facts, are we?
You are confirming what “was th8nking” is a fact???
Justice marshetti I presume. He has an ax to grind
Dr. Dershowitz is a success in life. You, are a failure, reduced to leaving ignorant comments on Matzav
What Peters actually tweeted was “It’s remarkable, the leak of what appears to be an initial draft majority opinion. SCOTUS generally has kept its secrets and has kept confidential its internal processes and deliberations. But the Court does occasionally leak, and it has leaked before about Roe v. Wade.” So I think you’re misrepresenting Peters’s opinion, Dr. Hall. It’s not “this is the first leak ever,” but neither is it “a leak–who cares?”.
How about quoting the start of Jonathan Peters’ statement: “Supreme Court leaks are rare and remarkable”. That sets the actual context. From there comes the “rare and remarkable” exceptions. But even then, nearly all examples are verbal, that is, someone claims that someone on the Supreme Court said something (with barely an example of even an accompanying memo). Compared to this leak, that was more like starting a rumour than it is a leak. But even in those previous examples, the Chief Justice was furious and instituted a rule that any law clerk seen even talking to the press for 20 seconds would be fired.
What happened here is that an actual physical draft of around 100 pages was “leaked”. That is unprecedented. And that suggests actual Supreme Court (Federal) physical property was pilfered in the process – and that pilfering is a Federal Crime.
The democrat operatives will do anything in order to take the attention off of Bidens failing polling numbers.
Will the phony democrats go after the whistleblower/leaker with the same energy as they are with the Jan 6th hoax?!
This leak was certainly not a fake, and it is glaringly clear that it was propelled by an extremely evil person who is fanatically opposed to any change of the Holy, Holy, Holy, Holy Engraved-In-Stone so-called “Law” of Roe vs. Wade of giving open license to the abortion murder of pre-born babies. This hyper-wicked gutter scum thug could not bear the thought of there being even the slightest pause in the contemporary killing of infants, so he or she blasted this big leak so that numerous likewise minded people could massively pressure — and even outright threaten — the morally oriented justices on the court to, Chas V’Shalom, refrain from doing the overturn.
Please be advised that ALONG WITH the wicked massive protests held today demanding MORE abortion with continuing the Roe vs. Wade thingy — in New York City they were held at Federal Plaza, also known as Foley Square, at 111 Worth Street in Lower Manhattan — there was also a COUNTER-protest held there demanding a STOP to abortion and ending the Roe vs. Wade travesty. Please see https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2677291/Video-Channel-rage-action-anti-abortion-rally-Foley-Square.html