The Federal Aviation Administration said Tuesday it had approved 90% of the nation’s commercial plane fleet to land when visibility is poor at airports where there is a risk of interference from 5G wireless signals.
The latest approvals, which include more small regional jets and some turboprops, should smooth airline operations, which have faced some disruption since the rollout of new 5G services by Verizon and AT&T last week. But the agency has warned some planes will prove too susceptible to interference to be cleared.
The FAA has been assessing devices called radio altimeters, which use radar to give precise measurements of a plane’s altitude, to determine whether they could give inaccurate readings because of interference from new 5G towers. The towers and radars operate on neighboring airwaves.
“This work has shown some altimeters are reliable and accurate in certain 5G areas; others must be retrofitted or replaced,” the agency said in a post to its website.
Disruptions to air service have continued this week. The Seattle Times reported that all the flights in and out of Paine Field in Everett, Washington, were canceled Monday due to the combination of bad visibility and the risk of 5G interference. The airport is served by Horizon Air, a regional airline and its president to the Seattle Times that its Embraer E175 jets still faced some restrictions.
Last week, regional planes trying to land at San Francisco International Airport were diverted in similar weather.
Major airlines warned of severe disruptions to travel in the days before the activation of the new wireless service – which had already been twice delayed – prompting the White House to broker a deal with Verizon and AT&T to create buffer zones around airports. The agreement appears to have largely been a success, with relatively few cancellations or delays, according to airline executives.
But in an update Tuesday, the FAA said it would need to review the approvals it has granted each month to determine if the activation of new towers poses additional risk.
“We’re working with the wireless companies to get us tower activation information as early as possible so we can plan ahead,” the FAA said.
(c),2022 The Washington Post · Ian Duncan
{Matzav.com}
If the airwaves of a 5G tower can completely upend a jetliner, can you just imagine what it does to a docile human carrying a smartphone? Where is the concern of the CDC? Where is the concern of Mr. Fauci? Where is the concern of Merrick Garland? Where is the concern of Kathy Hochul? Biden? Casey, Nadler, etc… They are so concerned about US (they don’t) wearing a dirty disposable mask but they’re not concerned for us about dangerous radio waves being emitted from 5G towers? It doesn’t fill their coffers? Verizon is above the law?
Can you just imagine what 5G RADIATION (like microwave) does to a docile VAXINATED (WITH GRAPHENE OXIDE, MAGNETISM AND ALUMINUM) human carrying a smartphone?
Airwaves?
Do you have the slightest idea of what you are writing about?
5G employs radio waves frequencies, that may interfere with older airplanes’ current communications, which use the same frequencies. What does that have to do with a person carrying a smartphone, that is made specifically to be used with those network protocols?
What do Garland, Fauci, the CDC, or the leprechauns have to do with this?
Why haven’t you also mentioned Netanyahu, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Mordechai ben David, or Julius Caesar? Why don’t you test your brainwaves, first.
What a blithering idiot!
Name calling is not appropriate.
I agree with airwaves who did some research. Maybe you should expand your brains out of covid box for a change.
A. None of the vaccines for ANY disease contain graphene oxide. None!
B. How does one inject “magnetism” into anything? Could one inject electricity or gravity? What about centripetal motion?
C. In actuality, both graphene (a highly toxic substance, which isn’t approved for internal use in any human application), and aluminum BLOCK 5G radio waves, anyhow.
Do you even know what graphene oxide is, what are it’s properties, and what is the definition of magnetism (aside from having something to do with refrigerator buttons)?
I am not going to ask you to explain the difference between current 4G and the upcoming 5G, because you probably believe that it “contains” one extra G, which must be terrible, because the government approved it, or, maybe, the added G is a secret code for Bill “G”ates….
Repeating whatever you read online, without a modicum of understanding, makes one into a fool, especially when the regurgitated information is absolutely false.
That’s right, one should never repeat anything you read online or hear from honest doctors. One should keep echoing mainstream “information” and stick to Faucism and you’ll live forever.