Feds Weigh Ban on All Phone Use by Drivers


cell-phoneU.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says he believes motorists are distracted by any use of mobile phones while driving, including hands-free calls, as his department begins research that may lead him to push for a ban.LaHood, whose campaign against texting and making calls while driving has led to restrictions in 30 states, says his concerns extend to vehicle information and entertainment systems such as Ford Motor Co.’s Sync and General Motors Co.’s OnStar.

“I don’t want people talking on phones, having them up to their ear or texting while they’re driving,” LaHood said in an interview this week. “We need a lot better research on other distractions,” including Bluetooth-enabled hands-free calls and the in-car systems, he said.

Even without a ban, which would have to be implemented by individual states, LaHood’s escalating campaign may limit the growth of vehicle features such as Sync, being added by automakers to attract younger buyers. His push also may reduce calls made from vehicles and the revenue of mobile-phone companies such as Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc.

LaHood, 64, said even hands-free phone conversations are a “cognitive distraction.” Calling for a ban on hands-free communications is a possible outcome of research under way at the Transportation Department’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration into all driver distractions, Olivia Alair, a department spokeswoman, said.

Too Ingrained?

LaHood plans to meet with the heads of all makers of cars sold in the U.S. to discuss their cooperation in limiting distracted driving, he said in the Oct. 5 interview. He said he’s not yet recommending restrictions on hands-free phone calls and didn’t say when he might make a decision.

The transportation secretary may have little chance of getting a ban by the states even if he decides one is justified, said Christopher King, a telecommunications analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore.

“It’s so ingrained at this point, I think banning that would be extremely difficult, bordering on folly,” King said in an interview. “There would be no legitimate, public support for an outright ban.”

The Transportation Department’s powers to push further limits on distracted driving range from exhortations to setting standards backed by the federal government’s financial clout. The government previously awarded highway aid to states based on whether they raised the legal drinking age to 21 or required seatbelt use.

What People Do

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers wants to make sure regulators don’t prohibit a wireless link in cars, said Wade Newton, a spokesman for the Washington-based group, whose 12 members include Ford, GM and Toyota Motor Corp.

Newton cited technologies that can automatically alert emergency responders if a car crashes and systems being developed that would alert drivers to changing weather or accidents ahead on the road.

“Our feeling is it’s a matter of balancing what we know people are going to do anyway with what technology can help them do safer in a vehicle,” he said. “We know that people are going to have conversations and look at maps and listen to music in a vehicle.”

The Transportation Department estimated about 5 percent of all drivers in 2009 were using mobile phones in their cars at any given time.

LaHood began campaigning last year to limit driver distractions that he says caused 5,474 deaths in 2009 and accounted for 16 percent of all road fatalities. The total was a 6 percent decline from 5,838 in 2008.

Wrong Focus

“In one year, we have made a difference,” LaHood said of his effort to win state restrictions. “Our goal is to get all 50 states.”

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which has said LaHood is focusing too much attention on distracted driving instead of other safety pursuits, released a study last month concluding laws banning handheld texting don’t reduce crashes. The study, using data from four states before and after they enacted anti-texting laws, found the overall number of crashes increased in three of the states.

The increase may stem from drivers taking their eyes off the road even more as they try to hide their phones from view while texting, Adrian Lund, president of the industry-sponsored group, said in an Oct. 5 interview.

Federal guidelines are planned next year to put into writing LaHood’s views on how much, if any, mobile communication by the driver is appropriate when a vehicle is in motion, said Ronald Medford, NHTSA’s deputy administrator.

Using Facebook

OnStar, with about 5.7 million subscribers, is testing an application that would let users make audio updates to their Facebook pages and have messages from the social-media site read to them while driving. The system already provides crash- notification services as well as directions and information such as vehicle diagnostics.

“I’m absolutely opposed to all of that,” LaHood said, when asked about drivers using the Facebook and Twitter social networks. “That would be the biggest distraction of all. All of that is well beyond the idea that you’re really trying to avoid distracted driving.”

Rebecca White, an OnStar spokeswoman, declined to comment.

Ford has been selling Sync, based on Microsoft Corp.’s voice-activated technology, since the 2008 model year. The Dearborn, Michigan-based company added features such as touch- command controls and voice-activated climate control this year.

Ford said in January it plans to bring social networking, Web browsing and thumb controls similar to those on Apple Inc.’s iPod to 80 percent of its models by 2015.

Eyes on the Road

“Research clearly shows that voice-controlled connectivity technologies provide substantial safety benefits because they allow drivers to keep their hands on the wheel and eyes on the road — key factors in reducing driving distractions,” said Wes Sherwood, a Ford spokesman.

“Car manufacturers always say ‘safety is our No. 1 priority,’ but yet you invest your money into developing these systems where you can update your Facebook status,” said Jennifer Smith, president of FocusDriven, a group whose founders lost family members in distracted-driving-related car crashes and wants all cell-phone use by drivers banned.

Chrysler Group LLC, which encourages drivers to use hands- free devices if they need to talk and drive, is sponsoring a Car and Driver magazine cellular phone application called TXT U L8r that responds to text messages with an alert that the person is unavailable, said Esperansita Bejnarowicz, a social-media manager at Chrysler.

Wireless Revenue

The U.S. wireless industry generated $152 billion in revenue last year from 2.3 trillion minutes of use, according to CTIA — the Wireless Association, a Washington-based trade group that represents mobile-phone services.

“We support no texting and driving,” Marquett Smith, a spokesman for Verizon Wireless, said in an e-mailed statement. “If a ban is put in place, we will encourage our customers to comply.”

The campaign against distracted driving and the use of mobile phones in the car will continue in stages, LaHood said.

“The bottom line for me is to get where we’re at with seat belts and with drunk driving,” LaHood said. “When those programs were started, people were very skeptical that you could get people to buckle up.”



  1. I agree. When someone is driving, the person’s attention, as well as the eyes, should be on the road, not elsewhere; and the person’s hands should be on the steering wheel.

    Otherwise, C”V a motor vehicle can turn into a potential killing machine.

  2. We don’t need the government to micro-manage every part of our lives. Some things are common sense. If we cannot talk on the phone at all, will the next rule be that you cannot talk to a passenger also because this may distract the driver. Let’s make single occupancy vehicles so that we are all safe and careful drivers.

    Hey moron government – Back off!! It’s the government that is broken.

  3. To Micro-managing: People are so stupid and do the stupidest things that put the rest of us in danger that yeah, we do need the gov’t to enact laws that will protect us from the irresponsible, idiotic behavior of cell phone users and texters while driving. These people are even more toxic than drunk or drugged drivers. Where common sense is lacking (sorely!) gov’t does need to step in. Statistics have proven that more accidents are caused by people on cell phones than by drunk drivers. (And if talking to a passenger is going to distract you to that same extent you should not be doing that, either. A little common sense is caled for in that case.) If the gov’t wants to increase revenue, this is where they should be focusing their ticket-giving, with zero tolerance.

  4. I disagree. I agree that certain locals and cities should have the ban, much like the no turn on red rule. For instance NYC. But the driving style, aggressiveness, narrow and overcrowded roads of NY are not everywhere. In those places talking on a phone is perfectly fine. One who hasn’t driven there may not get it.

    This is simply a way of empowering the federal govt, rather than minding their own business (which they’re doing terribly), and controlling everything

  5. “These people are even more toxic than drunk or drugged drivers.”

    You lose all credibility when you write things like that. If you really belive that…

    Hmm, let’s think why statistics show more accidents are caused by cell phones than drunk drivers. Ooh, I know, pick me, pick me! Maybe it’s – gasp – because more people use their phones than drive drunk? Yay, 10 points to me!!

    You are welcome to have an opinion that talking on the phone is dangerous. No problem. But when you say that it’s worse than driving drunk or stoned, it kind of makes me tune you out.

  6. Please have Mr LaHood explain the difference between my speaking with my wife seated next to me or via my hands free phone. The only difference i can figure out is when we finish the conversation, she remains in my car but not on my phone. In sum, there is zero practical difference and his idea is flawed from the start.

  7. and to #5 that means that YOU are more likely to get killed by a driver talking on a cell phone than a drunk driver.
    Therefore since we are people that enjoy living better than dying, we don’t want people to talk on their phones MORE THAN we don’t want people to drive drunk!
    Get it?

  8. one big difference… your wife you can just start talking to, your handsfree phone has to be located, dialed, hung up and redialed if its busy, spoken to, adjust the volume, pick up a call waiting, back to the original caller, adjust volume again, and then hang up. All of which are not hands free 🙂

  9. Let’s ban car stereos. Or conversing with passengers. Or passengers – period. Or thinking. Or eating. Or drinking. Or chewing gum. Or coughing. Or sneezing. OR BETTER YET – PROVIDE TRAINING FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT DO TWO THINGS AT ONCE.
    We already have distracted driving laws on the books. If someone is driving poorly – pull him over no matter what he’s doing.
    Please leave us normal folk alone!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here