First Conference on “Torah Archaeology” Held in Yerushalayim

>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

shaul-shimon-deutsch-2In the heart of Yerushalayim two weeks ago, the first charedi conference on “Torah archaeology” drew a packed audience.

The opening speaker, Rabbi Shaul Shimon Deutsch, brought several ancient coins to the conference, held in the Beis Bracha hall near Yerushalayim’s Meah She’arim neighborhood. Rabbi Deutsch, who flew in from Brooklyn for the event, runs a museum that displays artifacts he acquired on the private market from the time of the Mishna. Also among the artifacts, he displayed an intact scale that he said had been recovered several weeks earlier from a sunken ship in the Mediterranean Sea.

The scale, he said, settled once and for all a dispute that has raged among Torah scholars for centuries: How much did the litra, a Talmudic measure, actually weigh? The answer: 354 grams, just as Rashi claimed, and contrary to the opinion of other greats such as the Rambam.

This, as all the speakers agreed, is the purpose of charedi archaeology: using ancient artifacts to shed light on religious texts – as long as they don’t undermine the traditional reading of the texts. Thus, when Rabbi Deutsch showed the scale to Maran Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, he “said it was really a wonder of wonders,” Deutsch related.

Speakers also included archaeologists such as Prof. Benjamin Z. Kedar, a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, who chairs the Israel Antiquities Authority’s board. Kedar concurred that archaeology at times intersects with traditional Jewish texts, as “each sheds light on the other.”

{Haaretz/ Israel}


  1. how about this size /volume of eggs and olives that are the basis of required amounts of foods to be eaten

    i find it difficult to believe the amount of Matzah that needs to be eaten based on eggs and olives are the same (i think eating 2+/- ish Matzah in 2 minutes time was not done in the time of the Mishnah)

    sorry if my question is not clear
    it is difficult putting my thoughts to words and be respectable to Halacha at same time (which is what i want to do)

  2. Archaeology has also confirmed that Rashi is correct regarding the size of a Sela. Regardless, the halacha regarding he 5 sela’im for pidyon haben stays the same, as archaeology can’t override halacha. The hakdama to the Ketzos points out that the Rambam paskened against Hashem in a certain case, since the beis din shel maalah paskened otherwise.

  3. Not sure where the one in this article here is, but the rashi for the size of a sela is shemos 21:32, and the Ramban is Shemos 30:13 along with his hosafa at the end of chumash where he retracts and holds like Rashi.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here