House Democrats To Hold Contempt Vote Wednesday After Barr Misses Deadline To Provide Complete Mueller Report

Lawmakers on Tuesday repeatedly pressed attorney general nominee William Barr about a report expected to be produced by the special counsel. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Bonnie Jo Mount

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee said they will vote Wednesday on whether to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress after Barr missed a deadline to produce a complete version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

The panel had set a deadline of 9 a.m. Monday for Barr to provide the unredacted version of Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. It announced the planned vote in a statement Monday.

“Although the Committee has attempted to engage in accommodations with Attorney General Barr for several months, it can no longer afford to delay, and must resort to contempt proceedings,” reads the text of a contempt report released by Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. “The Committee urgently requires access to the full, unredacted Mueller Report and to the investigatory and evidentiary materials cited in the Report.”

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.

House Democrats’ move to hold the attorney general in contempt escalates the fight between President Trump and Congress. The president has vowed to fight all subpoenas and has refused to cooperate while Democrats insist they are carrying out their oversight role.

Democrats on the panel are also seeking to hear from Mueller amid disagreements about whether Barr mischaracterized the special counsel’s report in his congressional testimony and statements. A key lawmaker, Rep. David N. Cicilline (D-R.I.), said Sunday that the committee has proposed a date of May 15 for Mueller to testify but that no agreement has been reached.

Barr had released a redacted version on April 18, but Democrats said that was insufficient and have been seeking the full report and the underlying evidence.

In response to a committee subpoena, the Justice Department said last week that it was “unable to provide” Mueller’s investigative files, citing a “compelling need to protect the autonomy and effectiveness of its investigations.” Democrats had rejected an earlier offer by the department to make a less-redacted version of Mueller’s report available to select members of the House and Senate, saying it would prevent them from conducting effective oversight.

Rep. Douglas Collins, Ga., the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, responded to Monday’s news by accusing Democrats of “smearing” Barr out of dissatisfaction with the results of Mueller’s report.

“Chairman Nadler knows full subpoena compliance requires Attorney General Barr to break the law,” Collins said in a statement. “Yet, instead of introducing legislation allowing the attorney general to provide Congress grand jury material, Democrats move to hold him in contempt.”

The Justice Department has stated that revealing grand jury material in response to congressional oversight requests is barred by law. But Nadler has argued that courts have provided grand jury materials to Congress under the “judicial proceeding” exception in the past.

Barr last week declined to testify before the House Judiciary Committee, rejecting Democrats’ plans to have a counsel question him alongside lawmakers. The move infuriated Democrats, pushing them closer to holding Barr in contempt of Congress.

In his contempt resolution, Nadler pointed to the ongoing threat of Russian election interference as one of the reasons that Democrats are seeking to view a more complete version of Mueller’s report. Sections of the publicly-released version of Mueller’s report describing the actions of Russia’s Internet Research Agency and other Russian hacking efforts “contain significant redactions, which impair the ability of the Committee to gain a complete understanding of Russia’s actions,” the contempt report states.

“Without this information, the Committee is unable to fully perform its responsibility to protect the impending 2020 elections – and thus our democracy itself – from a recurrence of Russian interference,” the report states.

A contempt citation against Barr would set up a lengthy legal battle over the Mueller report, as Democrats take the matter to civil court.

The issue could take months or years to resolve, as was the case in 2012 when the Republican-led House sued Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. over documents related to the “Fast and Furious” investigation.

In 2012, the House also voted to hold Holder in contempt, the first sitting attorney general held in contempt of Congress.

(c) 2019, The Washington Post · Felicia Sonmez, Rachael Bade  



  1. BREAKING: Democrat Nadler Caught COLLUDING With CNN’s Jim Acosta

    The truth is coming out and this is a MASSIVE problem for the Democrats…
    New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the man at the helm of the cabal that is attacking President Donald Trump, has a major issue on his hands.
    It has been discovered that his son, Michael Nadler, works for Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, a New York based law firm.
    What is significant about this job is that that office has repeatedly sued President Trump, including on behalf of CNN reporter Jim Acosta, Big League Politics reported.
    “Congressman Jerry Nadler has a big conflict,” our source tells Big League Politics in Washington, D.C.
    “His son (Michael Nadler) got a job with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP in 2018. That’s convenient because Jerry Nadler and the Democrats just won control of the House in 2018.
    Gibson Dunn & Crutcher hire Jerry’s son and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher are the main Nemesis against Trump and the Trump Administration on numerous lawsuits.
    Now the Nadler family will gain access to thousands of Trump documents via Jerry’s subpoenas!,” our insider stated.
    Gibson Dunn represented CNN’s Jim Acosta in his lawsuit against the Trump White House after President Trump revoked Jim Acosta’s press credentials for creating a disturbance in a press briefing and making physical contact with a female White House intern.
    In December Gibson Dunn announced that it was representing the Center for Reproductive Rights in its lawsuit against the Trump State Department concerning abortion language in Trump administration human rights reports.
    Gibson Dunn’s global co-chairman Ted Boutros sued President Trump in a bid to protect the DACA Dreamer program.
    Such an arrangement — Jerry Nadler investigating Trump with his son’s firm trying to get access to documents in other cases — violates ethics rules for federal investigators.
    Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., one of the top attorneys at the firm, filed a lawsuit against President Trump over DACA and has tweeted many things against the president.

  2. It’s amazing how the narrative of the Dems went from Russian collusion with President Trump, to AG Barr refusing to be interrogated by democrat hacks. These ugly democrats are digging their hole deeper and deeper.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here