Operation Warp Speed Leader Says He May Step Down Soon

>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

Operation Warp Speed head Moncef Slaoui may step down from the government’s coronavirus vaccine and treatment accelerator “by the end this year or early next year,” he told POLITICO in an interview on Wednesday.

Slaoui since May has been atop an operation that has invested more than $10 billion into six vaccine candidates and multiple therapeutics, which has been widely viewed as one of the few success stories from the Trump administration’s response to Covid-19.

Read more at Politico



  1. https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4605885/pg1
    HUGE!!! Johns Hopkins DELETES Recent Article That Revealed Data EXPOSING The COVID Death Count Scam….
    Ladies and gentleman, the truth surrounding COVID is starting to leak in spades!

    Although we have always suspected that the official covid death count is highly inaccurate, it appears that we’re finally beginning to get a much clearer picture of just how bogus the “official” death count truly is. According to a recent Johns Hopkins article detailing the analysis of a researcher named Genevieve Briand, it seems that non-covid deaths from ALL causes took a HUGE nosedive this year. Strange? Well, guess what happened when Briand used the CDC’s own data to analyze all “non-covid” deaths and all “covid” deaths? She ultimately discovered that there aren’t really any “excessive” deaths for 2020. Translation: Most covid deaths being reported aren’t even covid deaths.

    Just one of the damning takeaways from the article:

    ..”The total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19″..

    So what happened a few days later? Johns Hopkins completely deletes the article and then makes a public statement how the article was being used to spread “misinformation”.

    Lucky for us, the internet never forgets.

  2. https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4603539/pg1
    PCR tests. How they “work” and what you aren’t being told.
    Thats all you hear in the media…”new cases, new cases” blah blah blah. Well what is a case? what determines a case?….a test? what is this test and how is it conducted?

    The PCR test. They obtain a specimen via swab. Then they extract RNA(ribonucleic acid) from that and convert to DNA.

    Next this gets AMPLIFIED by PCR with specific primers.

    Then they take the results and interpret them based on the presence of viral RNA.

    Sounds legit right? Well heres the problem that you can see in their studies and charts regarding how much they’re amplifying it. The level of amplification is measured in cycles.

    From their own studies and reports, the test is correct at up to 17 cycles. At an amplification of 27 cycles, the rate at which the test is correct drops to 65%. Once they do 33 cycles, now the test is only correct 20% of the time..

    At 34 cycles, there is a 0% CHANCE THAT THE RESULT IS CORRECT.

    With this information they did another study which took how much its being amplified and what day after you started showing symptoms you took the test. Up to 30 cycles, only being tested on the 3rd day you began showing symptoms, the test is correct 80%t of the time.

    At 27 cycles on day 4, the test is correct 60% of the time.
    At 17 cycles on day 5, the test is correct 33% of the time.
    After day 6, there is a 0% chance the test is correct.

    So why is this important? Why am I discussing this?
    Even after the CDC did these studies and knows how much they amplify it(cycles) affects the results, and even though they know that when you get tested also affects the results…….they havent changed the tests.

    Most PCR tests are being conducted at 40 cycles, some at 37. Im sure most of you can understand what this means.

    Here is the link with the chart comparing Amplification(CT) and the accuracy of the test. [link to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

    Here is the link with the chart showing Amplification and when the test is taken.
    [link to http://www.cebm.net (secure)]

    There are now scientists and doctors starting lawsuits around the world to make people aware of this.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here