Over 1,000 Health Professionals Sign a Letter Saying: “Don’t Shut Down Protests Using Coronavirus Concerns As An Excuse”

13
Washington Post photo by Jabin Botsford
>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

CNN reports that a group of health and medical colleagues has penned an open letter to express their concern that protests around the United States could be shut down under the guise of coronavirus health concerns.

The letter — which went on to draw more than 1,200 signatures — focuses on techniques to reduce harm to people protesting racial injustice.

The letter focuses on health guidance for protestors and law enforcement, such as wearing masks, advocating to not hold people who are arrested in close proximity and opposing the use of tear gas for health reasons.

Dr. Abby Hussein, an infectious disease fellow at the University of Washington, noted that for black Americans this was truly a “life or death matter” and that protestors weren’t taking actions lightly.

READ THE FULL LETTER:

Open letter advocating for an anti-racist public health response to demonstrations against systemic injustice occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic

On April 30, heavily armed and predominantly white protesters entered the State Capitol building in Lansing, Michigan, protesting stay-home orders and calls for widespread public masking to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Infectious disease physicians and public health officials publicly condemned these actions and privately mourned the widening rift between leaders in science and a subset of the communities that they serve. As of May 30, we are witnessing continuing demonstrations in response to ongoing, pervasive, and lethal institutional racism set off by the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, among many other Black lives taken by police. A public health response to these demonstrations is also warranted, but this message must be wholly different from the response to white protesters resisting stay-home orders. Infectious disease and public health narratives adjacent to demonstrations against racism must be consciously anti-racist, and infectious disease experts must be clear and consistent in prioritizing an anti-racist message.

White supremacy is a lethal public health issue that predates and contributes to COVID-19. Black people are twice as likely to be killed by police compared to white people, but the effects of racism are far more pervasive. Black people suffer from dramatic health disparities in life expectancy, maternal and infant mortality, chronic medical conditions, and outcomes from acute illnesses like myocardial infarction and sepsis. Biological determinants are insufficient to explain these disparities. They result from long-standing systems of oppression and bias which have subjected people of color to discrimination in the healthcare setting, decreased access to medical care and healthy food, unsafe working conditions, mass incarceration, exposure to pollution and noise, and the toxic effects of stress. Black people are also more likely to develop COVID-19. Black people with COVID-19 are diagnosed later in the disease course and have a higher rate of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and death. COVID-19 among Black patients is yet another lethal manifestation of white supremacy. In addressing demonstrations against white supremacy, our first statement must be one of unwavering support for those who would dismantle, uproot, or reform racist institutions.

Staying at home, social distancing, and public masking are effective at minimizing the spread of COVID-19. To the extent possible, we support the application of these public health best practices during demonstrations that call attention to the pervasive lethal force of white supremacy. However, as public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health and to the threatened health specifically of Black people in the United States. We can show that support by facilitating safest protesting practices without detracting from demonstrators’ ability to gather and demand change. This should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-home orders. Those actions not only oppose public health interventions, but are also rooted in white nationalism and run contrary to respect for Black lives. Protests against systemic racism, which fosters the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 on Black communities and also perpetuates police violence, must be supported.

Therefore, we propose the following guidance to support public health:

● Support local and state governments in upholding the right to protest and allow protesters to gather.

● Do not disband protests under the guise of maintaining public health for COVID-19 restrictions.

● Advocate that protesters not be arrested or held in confined spaces, including jails or police vans, which are some of the highest-risk areas for COVID-19 transmission.

● Oppose any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID- 19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation, and inducing coughing.

● Demand that law enforcement officials also respect infection prevention recommendations by maintaining distance from protesters and wearing masks.

● Reject messaging that face coverings are motivated by concealment and instead celebrate face coverings as protective of the public’s health in the context of COVID-19.

● Prepare for an increased number of infections in the days following a protest. Provide increased access to testing and care for people in the affected communities, especially when they or their family members put themselves at risk by attending protests.

● Support the health of protesters by encouraging the following:

○ Use of face coverings.

○ Distance of at least 6 feet between protesters, where possible.

○ Demonstrating consistently alongside close contacts and moving together as a group, rather than extensively intermingling with multiple groups.

○ Staying at home when sick, and using other platforms to oppose racism for high-risk individuals, and those unable or uncomfortable to attend in person.

● Encourage allies who may wish to facilitate safe demonstrations through the following:

○ Providing masks, hand-washing stations, or hand sanitizer to demonstrators.

○ Providing eye protection, such as face shields or goggles, for protection against COVID-19 and chemical irritants used to disperse crowds.

○ Bringing wrapped, single-serving food or beverages to sustain people protesting.

○ Providing chalk markings or other designations to encourage appropriate distancing between protesters.

○ Supplying ropes, which can be knotted at 6-foot intervals, to allow people to march together while maintaining spacing.

○ Donating to bail funds for protesters

● Listen, and prioritize the needs of Black people as expressed by Black voices.

These are strategies for harm reduction. It is our sincere hope that all participants will be able to follow these suggestions for safer public demonstrations, assisted by allies where possible and necessary, but we recognize that this may not always be the case. Even so, we continue to support demonstrators who are tackling the paramount public health problem of pervasive racism. We express solidarity and gratitude toward demonstrators who have already taken on enormous personal risk to advocate for their own health, the health of their communities, and the public health of the United States. We pledge our services as allies who share this goal.

Source: Cable News Network, Inc.


13 COMMENTS

  1. I thought this letter was a prank…. this basically says that if the protest is urgent enough then its recommended…. that means that every frum yid should shudder that these are the health professionals that are hindering our lives by preventing our yeshivos and shuls from opening…. in other words if it’s really important then you don’t need the distancing…

  2. Health and medical professionals? Why are they meddling with coronavirus health issues, masks, distancing, infections and instructions? Isn’t that the concerns of politicians; governor and mayor and president? At least it has been so till now.

  3. On the one hand, some who argued aggressively for shutting down not just most economic activity but almost all religious services now are arguing that political protests should be allowed in spite of the danger of spreading a deadly virus.

    On the other hand, some who argued against shutdowns in order to protect the stock market and other businesses, supported the take over of state capitals by armed thugs carrying swastikas, confederate flags, and semiautomatic rifles, have now called for military rule in the US in order to prevent peaceful protests, actually gassed peaceful protesters, and seized at least one church.

    The nutty far left and the nutty far right are equally dangerous.

    • Incorrect. Terrible spin on your part. The extreme far left number in the millions. Just look at how many people voted for Hillary Clinton. The far right is merely a handful of nut-cases, 0.001% of the population.

    • Charles, what exactly is wrong being far right patriots of the country? If not for far right conservatives, Judaism would’ve been gone hundreds of years ago.

    • while i agree to the part that the nutty far right are equally dangerous, your overall comment is incorrect.
      Because the ones worried about wall st, in large part, were skeptical of this entire lockdown approach. Now however, their claims seem to be corroborated, because suddenly its not such a big concern.

  4. We owe a tremendous hakoras hatov to matzav. These past few months were very tense. Sometimes we need a little humor to get through rough times. This article was a riot. (Pun intended.) Thank you matzav for the laughs.

  5. “However, as public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health and to the threatened health specifically of Black people in the United States.
    “This should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-home orders. Those actions not only oppose public health interventions but are also rooted in white nationalism and run contrary to respect for Black lives. Protests against systemic racism, which fosters the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 on Black communities and also perpetuates police violence, must be supported.”

    These people are saying that Covid19 is a manifestation of white supremacism, so protesting white supremacism is a form of healing the Covid-19 pandemic. Covid-19 is another tool that was created by the “white man” to decimate the blacks. Who is this talking? Al Sharpton?

  6. Hey, they left out the most important part: All the businesses should unlock their doors before going to bed – and leave everything HEFKER.

  7. If chalila there is ever a second wave of Covid, I highly doubt too many people are going to trust the professionals about lockdown again after seeing how two-faced and hypocritical they are.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here