Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute ‘Global Warming’ Skeptics

4
>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

GLOBAL WARMINGThe science on global warming is settled – so settled that 20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming.

Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that “have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.”

RICO was a law designed to take down organized crime syndicates, but scientists now want it to be used against scientists, activists and organizations that voice their disagreement with the so-called “consensus” on global warming. The scientists repeated claims made by environmentalists that groups, especially those with ties to fossil fuels, have engaged in a misinformation campaign to confuse the public on global warming.

Special: New Probiotic Fat Burner Takes GNC by Storm
“The actions of these organizations have been extensively documented in peer-reviewed academic research and in recent books,” the scientists wrote.

THE DAILY CALLER

{Matzav.com Newscenter}


4 COMMENTS

  1. In this country you have a constitutional right to be a blathering idiot by rejecting scientific facts. Donald Trump is such an idiot as demonstrated by his claims that there might be come connection between vaccines and autism. This is no different.

  2. If the Justice Dept feels there’s court admissible evidence of criminal wrongdoing they should indeed prosecute, I’m sure the oil industry billionaires will have good lawyers defending them. It should make an interesting case.

  3. Dear Charlie, the real blathering idiocy is believing the gospel of global warming because of a some mythical majority of scientists. Since when does the truth of science depend on majority? The computer models have promised (slightly exaggerated for illustration purposes but true in essence) Manhattan under water and tropical heat in Siberia – promised to happen a decade ago – the oceans did not rise and the temperature actually fell in the past decade. The scientific approach would have been to admit the theory wrong and close the topic. The medieval-church-like dogmatic approach is to fabricate evidence, scream the sky is falling, and to burn heretics at the stake. The real use of the legend of global warming is to subdue the population of this planet to the hypocritical fascist elites.

Leave a Reply to Charlie Hall Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here