A sharp internal dispute erupted Wednesday night within the chareidi political establishment, as a senior chareidi official involved in legislative negotiations accused Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman Boaz Bismuth of providing misleading assurances regarding the legal viability of the revised Chok HaGiyus.
The tensions surfaced hours after Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara issued a forceful legal opinion rejecting central components of the proposed draft law and its framework for regulating the status of bnei yeshivos. Her stance, while expected, ignited renewed criticism of the legislative process.
According to senior chareidi officials familiar with the behind-the-scenes discussions, the Attorney General’s position came as no surprise. “It was predictable. We knew this was her view. There was never any doubt she would argue that the law is unconstitutional and unequal,” the officials said, noting that no meaningful attempt was made to coordinate with her. “She wants to topple the government, so what’s written in the law is irrelevant.”
But what caught chareidi lawmakers truly off guard was the position of the Knesset’s own legal adviser to the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Miri Frenkel-Shor.
A senior chareidi figure expressed anger over what he described as misleading assurances from Bismuth. “Throughout the past two months, Bismuth told us that every clause in the law was coordinated with the committee’s legal adviser, that there would be no surprises. But it appears he lied to us. No less than that,” the official charged.
He pointed to Frenkel-Shor’s firm rejection of the very first core section of the legislation—specifically the attempt to incorporate security-oriented civilian service into the draft quotas. “When the adviser says ‘absolutely not’ on the central opening section, it shows he wasn’t actually in sync with her,” the senior official said. “And this is just the beginning. At this rate, there won’t be a law. We won’t pass legislation that stands in direct opposition to the Knesset’s legal advisers. The damage outweighs any gain.”
Meanwhile, the Attorney General’s detailed fifteen-page opinion, addressed directly to Bismuth, blasted the proposal for prioritizing the needs of the yeshivos over the pressing needs of the defense establishment.
Among her statements, she wrote: “In the described reality, reviewing the committee chair’s proposal shows that not only does it fail to advance the enlistment of the chareidi public into military service, but it contains a negative incentive for enlistment and anchors, for the long term, the inequality between those who serve and those who do not—while deepening it.”
She further argued: “In practice, the proposal rolls back the tools currently available to the government and the army compared to the existing legal framework, undermining the ability to meet the military’s current needs.”
Baharav-Miara contended that the law caters primarily to the yeshivah world by immediately restoring direct and indirect funding, reinstating benefits to bnei yeshivos, canceling draft notices and enforcement measures for draft evaders, and re-establishing the framework that binds chareidi young men to yeshivos until age 26 as a condition for exemption.
At the same time, she stated, the bill fails to provide the military or the state with any effective mechanisms for enforcing enlistment or alleviating the burden currently borne by the reserve corps.
Her opinion concludes that the proposal falls far short of constitutional requirements regarding proportionality, equality, and legitimate purpose. “Its harm to equality is severe,” she wrote, adding that minor revisions will not be sufficient. Instead, she called for a “fundamental overhaul,” beginning with the principle of equal and universal conscription.
{Matzav.com}
