From a Breitbart report: Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday on “CBS Evening News” that President Donald Trump led a “seditious conspiracy against the government of the United States” to hold on to power after losing the 2020 presidential election.
Referencing the hearings of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 riot, anchor Norah O’Donnell asked, “What is your takeaway about the January 6 committee and Donald Trump’s actions?”
Clinton said, “I would not be honest if I didn’t say I think there was a seditious conspiracy against the government of the United States, and that’s a crime.”
O’Donnell said, “Led by Donald Trump.”
Clinton said, “Led by Donald Trump, encouraged by Donald Trump.”
She continued, “You know, I was the secretary of state. I spent, you know, many days on airplanes, flying from place to place, encouraging people to have a real democracy. And one of the hallmarks of a real democracy is the peaceful transfer of power.” Clinton added, “Was I happy when I beat Donald Trump by nearly 3 million votes but lost the Electoral College? No, I was not happy. Did I ever for a nanosecond think, ‘I’m gonna claim victory and try to get the Democrats to refuse to certify the election?’ No.”
“The White House said today that in 1978 Hillary Rodham Clinton invested $1,000 in commodities futures and that the investment grew in 10 months of trading in the notoriously volatile market into a gain of nearly $100,000.”
Hillary Clinton is as clean & pure as the wind driven snow. She had nothing to do with the deaths of Vince Foster, Seth Rich, or Ron Brown.
The Americans that were slaughtered by Muslims in Benghazi was due to a spontaneous uprising.
and neither with the Frazzledrip
Interesting article in New York Magazine from November, 2016 that says “Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked….
“The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes….”
Halderman, himself, wrote on the ‘Medium’ website that: “You may have read at NYMag that I’ve been in discussions with the Clinton campaign about whether it might wish to seek recounts in critical states….”
How might a foreign government hack America’s voting machines to change the outcome of a presidential election? Here’s one possible scenario. First, the attackers would probe election offices well in advance in order to find ways to break into their computers. Closer to the election, when it was clear from polling data which states would have close electoral margins, the attackers might spread malware into voting machines in some of these states, rigging the machines to shift a few percent of the vote to favor their desired candidate.
“This malware would likely be designed to remain inactive during pre-election tests, do its dirty business during the election, then erase itself when the polls close. A skilled attacker’s work might leave no visible signs — though the country might be surprised when results in several close states were off from pre-election polls…..”
“The only way to know whether a cyberattack changed the result is to closely examine the available physical evidence — paper ballots and voting equipment in critical states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, nobody is ever going to examine that evidence unless candidates in those states act now, in the next several days, to petition for recounts…..”
Interesting.
A big joke. The entire democrat party tried to block the certification of the 2016 election. Her husband didn’t allow the bush team in the white house to learn about transitioning and other details that every incoming president gets.
A few observations:
1) Winning the popular vote means nothing. Campaigns don’t run to win the popular vote, they run for electoral votes. If the popular vote was what counted, the campaigns would’ve been run entirely differently and the results might have been Hillary winning by an even bigger margin, Hillary winning by the same margin, or Trump winning – we have no way of knowing.
2) Hillary sure likes her conspiracies. Now it’s a ‘Seditious Conspiracy’, previously it was a “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy”.
3) Bush 43 was a mentsch. While I couldn’t stand Obama, he seemed to be a decent family man. But Hillary, Trump, and Biden? Ugh, ugh, and ugh.
I demand a recount.