Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says ex-Assemblyman Dov Hikind’s lawsuit against her for blocking him on Twitter is bogus because the account in question is “personal,” new court papers reveal, the NY Post reports.
Through her lawyer, the freshman congresswoman told a judge Wednesday that the legal precedent cited by Hikind — which centers on President Trump’s Twitter account — is a completely different set of circumstances, according to a letter filed in Brooklyn federal court.
“The facts in this case are significantly distinct from [Trump’s]. The complaint itself concedes that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez maintains an official twitter account @repAOC that is completely separate from her personal @AOC account,” her attorney, Allyson Belovin, wrote to Judge Frederic Block. The liberal darling also denies that she blocked Hikind “because of the content of his speech,” according to the letter. Read more at the NY Post.
{Matzav.com}
Of course whatever liberals do is always different from what republicans do we are always right and you are always wrong
Dov go back to your daf yome where u came from and stop making insane arguments.
Keep going Dov. AOC has to be taught a lesson. Democrats & Liberals are good at suing everyone that disagrees with them but they disallow anyone from ever suing them. Unfortunately the corrupt appointed judges always side with the democrats. They are paid off handsomely. The hypocrisy is revolting.
the media changed her name to O’CRAZIO Cortess
Trump blocked people from his “@realDonaldTrump “, which is self-evidently a private account. Despite that the Court ruled it is still a public forum from which no public official is allowed to block anyone from the public. To quote the actual court ruling which seems rather clear:
This case requires us to consider whether a public official
may, consistent with the First Amendment, “block” a person from
his Twitter account in response to the political views that person
has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public
official is the President of the United States. The answer to
both questions is no.
Weird headline. She’s nuts indeed. But not for this reason . This is a laws suit and she defending herself. This doesn’t make her nuts
Yes, she’s nuts. No, she’s no lady.