It may be weeks or months until we know why Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed minutes after takeoff Sunday, killing all 157 passengers and crew on board – if the cause of the crash is determined at all.
But the deadly incident is drawing comparisons to another air disaster, the Oct. 29 wreck of Lion Air Flight 610, which went down off the coast of Indonesia, killing all 189 people on board.
On Monday, Ethiopia, China and other countries grounded the type of aircraft involved in both crashes. U.S. and European regulators have yet to act.
Though the Indonesian crash is still under investigation, a preliminary report released in October by local authorities offers details that are strikingly similar to the Ethiopian Airlines flight.
Both incidents involved the Boeing 737 Max 8. And there are other parallels: Both aircraft crashed just minutes after takeoff; both struggled to gain altitude; and both appeared to ascend and descend several times before crashing.
1. Both flights crashed within minutes of takeoff
Lion Air Flight 610 took off from Jakarata’s Soekarno-Hatta International Airport at 6:20 a.m. Oct. 29 in clear conditions. Just 12 minutes into its journey to Depati Amir Airport in Pangkal Pinang, it crashed into the sea off the coast of Java.
Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 left Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, at 8:38 a.m. on route to Nairobi. It lost contact with air traffic control roughly six minutes later, crashing near Bishoftu, less than 40 miles away. Thus far, there is no indication that foul weather was involved.
2. Both flights struggled to gain altitude
When Lion Air Flight 610 left Jakarta, it was supposed to reach a cruising altitude of 27,000 feet, according to the preliminary report. But the flight struggled to gain altitude, limiting the crew’s room to gain control before the plane plummeted into the ocean at a reported 450 mph.
Though there has yet to be an investigation into Flight 302, preliminary data collected by Flightradar24 suggests the aircraft struggled to climb at a steady speed.
In both cases, pilots alerted air traffic control that there was something wrong and asked to return to base. Neither made it back in time.
3. Both flights ascended and descended several times before nose-diving
What is most striking about Lion Air’s 12-minute journey is how the plane pitched downward more than two dozen times before its final, deadly, plunge.
Though it is not yet clear what happened aboard the Ethiopian Airlines flight, – and there may be no connection between what happened in Indonesia and Ethiopia – the aircraft also appeared to ascend and descend while accelerating at high speed, according to preliminary data from Flightradar24.
In the case of the Indonesian crash, the preliminary report offers some clues as to what caused the nose of the plane to repeatedly dip.
The study found that the aircraft’s flight maintenance log showed several problems with the plane each day between Oct. 26 and Oct. 29, including errors involving air speed and altitude information displays.
The preliminary report also found that some of the aircraft’s equipment was checked before its final flight, but that the aircraft’s “angle of attack” sensor was not. The angle of attack sensor measures where the jet’s nose is pointing.
A key finding was that this sensor was sending erroneous readings throughout the short flight that day, The Washington Post reported.
As the aircraft made its initial ascent, the sensor insisted the nose of the plane was too high and an automatic feature kicked in, sending the plane downward as the pilots struggled to force it back up.
“Black-box data released by Indonesian investigators showed that the pilots were pulling back on the control column, attempting to raise the plane’s nose, with almost 100 pounds of pressure before they crashed,” the Post reported.
Though the preliminary report stressed that the investigation was ongoing and did not assign blame for what happened, the crash raised questions about whether airlines and pilots had been trained on all the 737 Max’s software features.
The Federal Aviation Administration issued an emergency notice to all airlines that fly the aircraft, warning them that faulty sensor inputs “could cause the flight crew to have difficulty controlling the airplane,” leading to “possible impact with terrain.”
(c) 2019, The Washington Post · Emily Rauhala
{Matzav.com}
Reports from witnesses of this week’s crash say they saw smoke and debris trailing from the plane before it crashed. That sounds like an onboard explosion. Terrorism? Cover-up?????
Or mechanical failure.
Stupid software. If the sensor says the plain is too high it makes it go lower disregarding 100 pound push by the pilot.
Didnt software guys expect the sensor to brake at some point?