Walmart Will Stop Locking Up ‘Multicultural’ Hair And Beauty Products

8
>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

Walmart, the country’s largest retailer, said it will stop locking up “multicultural” hair and beauty products in display cases in a move civil rights activists and academics say is long overdue.

The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer on Wednesday reversed its years-long policy – which was in place at about a dozen of its 4,700 U.S. stores – after mounting criticism that the practice is racist against black shoppers.

“Walmart does not tolerate discrimination of any kind,” the company said in a statement on Twitter. “We serve millions of customers every day from diverse backgrounds.”

The retail giant is the latest corporation to change policies amid a nationwide reckoning over systemic racism after the death of George Floyd, a black man, in Minneapolis police custody last month. Major retailers have taken steps to publicly support the Black Lives Matter movement and fund anti-racism initiatives. Others are making incremental changes to address racial disparities. Cosmetics giant Sephora, for example, has pledged to devote at least 15% of its shelf space to black-owned businesses.

Activists and academics said the efforts were a step in the right direction, though they said companies should also try to effect change from within by hiring and promoting more black and minority employees to leadership positions.

Cassi Pittman, a professor at Case Western Reserve University whose work focuses on how black consumers manage racism, said Walmart’s policy was a “classic example” of how corporate decisions can encourage racial biases.

“The practice of locking up products more likely to be used by black customers unfairly burdens them, adding costs in terms of time and an emotional toll,” she said in an email. “It makes spending money on the products that meet their needs more burdensome.”

Walmart has long faced controversy over its practice of locking up products for black customers, particularly in low-income neighborhoods. A 2018 lawsuit filed in California said the practice was a form of racial discrimination. That lawsuit, Essie Grundy v. Walmart, was dropped in November.

The retailer last week pledged $100 million to create a center for racial equity that it said would “address systematic racism in society head-on” by supporting the country’s financial, health-care, education and criminal justice systems.

“The racial violence in the U.S. – in particular, the murder of George Floyd – is tragic, painful and unacceptable,” chief executive Doug McMillon wrote in a blog post Friday. “We are going to invest resources and develop strategies to increase fairness, equity and justice in aspects of everyday life.”

(c) 2020, The Washington Post · Abha Bhattarai 

{Matzav.com}


8 COMMENTS

  1. I wonder if they locked up items that were constantly being stolen, in which case I don’t see any racism and if anyone is offended they deserve to be.

  2. What a bunch of morons. If Walmart is locking them up, it’s because those products are getting stolen more than others. If it happens to be ‘multicultural’ products, so be it. This has nothing to do with racism, as any thinking person can tell.

    • That would be “racist” to raise prices on these items due to being shoplifted. Instead, Walmart will raise prices on everything else. Their quality sucks, their prices aren’t the cheapest and about to get even higher, so goodbye Walmart.

    • NO, the prices of YOUR products will go up, because those items will continue to be taken out for free.
      Hope this country will not have to be turned over, because this place is becoming worse then sodom.

  3. Walmart is a store for losers anyway. They sell nothing of value other than an 8 pack of underwear with 2 free, making it a pack of 10 underpants for the price of 8. Wow. What savings. Unbelievable. Yeh, let me wait in line with the dregs of society, because of the new social distancing rules, just to get into the store, so I can purchase inferior quality products. Sure.

  4. Walmart was keeping these products pristine for the consumer. So why do all these people (and in particular this Cassi Pittman person) want to spread COVID-19 to the black consumers? The black consumers are already showing up statistically as more susceptible to this virus, and now these people want to make even worse by letting anyone and everyone spread their germs on these products.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here