The Supreme Court just ruled that double standards are acceptable and that the courts shouldn’t be micromanaging public health. Chief Justice Roberts was particularly strong in his opinion on the matter.
Roberts said the limits on religious gathering were similar to those that apply to other places where people gather closely together for long periods of time, including concert halls, movie theaters, sporting arenas, theaters and therefore legal.
Even the liberals on the court (hopefully) would still oppose a blatant double standard
This has zero to do micromanaging public health and everything to do with overly selective enforcement of the law against one ethnic group in the activities that a group partakes in while allowing protests riots and parties with no social distancing whatsoever That is a prima facie violation of selective enforcement and the free exercise clause
The Supreme Court just ruled that double standards are acceptable and that the courts shouldn’t be micromanaging public health. Chief Justice Roberts was particularly strong in his opinion on the matter.
They ruled nothing of the sort
Roberts said the limits on religious gathering were similar to those that apply to other places where people gather closely together for long periods of time, including concert halls, movie theaters, sporting arenas, theaters and therefore legal.
Even the liberals on the court (hopefully) would still oppose a blatant double standard
See this report and the comments :
Special times ahead
https://matzav.com/rav-alter-yaakov-schlesinger-stabbed-in-london/
This has zero to do micromanaging public health and everything to do with overly selective enforcement of the law against one ethnic group in the activities that a group partakes in while allowing protests riots and parties with no social distancing whatsoever That is a prima facie violation of selective enforcement and the free exercise clause