Wikileaks: Hillary to Goldman Sachs: Americans Who Want to Limit Immigration Are ‘Fundamentally UnAmerican’


Julia Hahn reports for Breitbart that Hillary Clinton told Goldman Sachs executives that Americans who want to limit immigration are “fundamentally un-American,” according to the leaked transcript of her private October 2013 speech made public by WikiLeaks.

Clinton’s statement is significant because it suggests that, according to polling data, Clinton views an overwhelming majority of the American electorate to be “fundamentally un-American.” According to data from Pew Research Center, 83% of the American electorate would like to see immigration levels frozen or reduced.

Clinton’s declaration describing those who want to limit immigration as “unAmerican” came in the context of her urging action on “immigration reform.”

Clinton told the Wall Street executives that those who oppose dramatic expansions to immigration are “fundamentally un-American”:

“What I really resent most about the obstructionists is they have such a narrow view of America. They see America in a way that is no longer reflective of the reality of who we are. They’re against immigration for reasons that have to do with the past, not the future. They can’t figure out how to invest in the future, so they cut everything. You know, laying off, you know, young researchers, closing labs instead of saying, we’re better at this than anybody in the world, that’s where our money should go. They just have a backward-looking view of America. And they play on people’s fears, not on people’s hopes, and they have to be rejected. I don’t care what they call themselves. I don’t care where they’re from. They have to be rejected because they are fundamentally unAmerican.”

Read more at Breitbart.




  1. Wow. “They should be rejected”, “un-American”… Is that her vision of inclusive? The arrogance and disdain for anyone not agreeing with her is astounding. “Needy Latinos”, “Those Christians”, “Deplorables”, “Unredeemable”, “Un-American”, “Basement Dwellers”

    I thought a president was president for ALL citizens. My brother and I think very differently on a number of issues, but that doesn’t mean he’s not my brother because he has a different ideology on economics, or immigration. Such disdain for the citizens she wants to represent. Wait…that’s the mistake. She doesn’t want to represent them, she wants money, power and to be in the books as first woman president. It’s not about public service, it’s about personal gains.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here