REVEALED: Dr. Anthony Fauci Confesses He ‘Made Up’ Covid Rules Including 6 Feet Social Distancing and Masking Kids

Groundbreaking testimony from Dr. Anthony Fauci reveals that he simply made up the six-foot social distancing rule and other measures to “protect” Americans from COVID-19.

Republicans released the complete transcript of their January interview with Fauci, just days ahead of his eagerly anticipated public testimony on Monday.

They intend to question him about the COVID-19 restrictions he implemented, which he admitted did little to “slow the spread” of the virus.

The learning loss and social challenges faced by children have been extensively documented, with a National Institute of Health (NIH) study describing the impact of mask usage on students’ literacy and learning as “very negative.”

Another NIH study found that social distancing led to “depression, generalized anxiety, acute stress, and intrusive thoughts.”

In a conversation with the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic earlier this year, Fauci informed Republicans that the six-foot social distancing rule “sort of just appeared” and he couldn’t remember how it originated.

“You know, I don’t recall. It sort of just appeared,” he said according to committee transcripts when questioned about the rule’s origin.

He also mentioned he “was not aware of studies” supporting social distancing, admitting that such studies “would be very difficult” to conduct.

In addition to not recalling evidence supporting social distancing, Fauci also told the committee’s counsel that he couldn’t remember reviewing anything that supported masking children to prevent COVID-19.

“Do you recall reviewing any studies or data supporting masking for children?” he was asked.

“I might have,” he replied, adding “but I don’t recall specifically that I did.”

Fauci also testified that he did not follow any studies regarding the impacts of forced mask-wearing on children, despite numerous such studies existing.

Ironically, he commented, “I still think that’s up in the air,” regarding whether masking children was an effective way to prevent transmission.

Furthermore, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) acknowledged that the lab leak theory—the notion that COVID-19 originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)—is a legitimate “possibility.”

“I think people have made conspiracy aspects from it,” he said, adding “it could be a lab leak.”

“So I think that in and of itself isn’t inherently a conspiracy theory, but some people spin off things from that that are kind of crazy.”

His admission that COVID-19 may have originated at the WIV comes four years after he supported the publication of a paper dismissing the lab leak theory, known as the “Proximal Origin” paper.

The coronavirus committee has spent months investigating the origins of the virus that disrupted so many lives and resulted in the deaths of 6 million people worldwide.

Recently, they discovered that Fauci’s former top aide, Dr. David Morens, frequently conducted work on his personal email account and deleted files to circumvent government transparency laws under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Morens’ disregard for FOIA requests was so blatant that he bragged in emails to colleagues about learning how to make official correspondence “disappear” and that he would delete things he didn’t “want to see in the New York Times.”

Emails from Morens, uncovered by the committee, revealed that he boasted about having a “secret back channel” to Fauci, allowing him to covertly communicate with the former NIAID director.

This revelation stunned the committee’s chairman, Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, who demanded that Fauci turn over his personal email and phone records to the investigative body.

Equally surprising was Fauci’s January admission to the committee that he “never” reviewed the grants he approved, some of which amounted to millions of taxpayer dollars.

“You know, technically, I sign off on each council, but I don’t see the grants and what they are. I never look at what grants are there,” he told the committee’s counsel.

Moreover, he stated he was “not certain” that foreign labs receiving U.S. grant money, such as the WIV—studying coronaviruses with U.S. taxpayer dollars at the pandemic’s onset—operated under the same standards as American labs.

Fauci also said the funds he distributed as part of the NIAID grant process did not undergo any national security reviews.

Additionally, the former director claimed he was unaware of any conflicts of interest among his staff, including his senior advisor Dr. Morens.

However, Morens testified before the committee on May 22 that he assisted his “best friend,” EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak, with his nonprofit’s work.

Morens said he helped edit press releases for EcoHealth and worked to restore grant funding for the nonprofit after its funding was terminated following the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020.

The NIH, which employs Morens, funded Daszak’s EcoHealth to the tune of millions of dollars.

Still, Fauci claimed he was unaware that Morens had any conflicts of interest.

The committee will likely seek to clarify Fauci and Morens’ “secret back channel” of communication during the June 3 hearing.

{Dov T. Heller – Matzav.com}