Supreme Court to Have Conference On Obama’s Eligibility to Be President


obama3In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another “conference” on a legal challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.

The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.

It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.

At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the “motion for recusal” but it changed it on official docketing pages to a “request.” And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.



  1. Every day that passes, without Obama’s (official) birth certificate further raises the question of his eligibility for the office of president.

    Even the Governor of Hawaii (a Democrat and Obama supporter) was at a loss after trying (in vain) to find Obama’s birth certificate in the State’s official records.

    What is more troubling, however, is the attempt of various groups and news outlets to charecterize this inquiry or any such question concerning Obama’s country of birth as ‘radical’, ‘extremist’, racist etc.

  2. Within our party, we’ve got to be very careful about allowing these people who are the birthers and the 9/11-deniers to get too high a profile and say too much without setting the record straight,” “We need the leaders of our party to say, ‘Look, stop falling into the trap of the White House and focus on the real issues,

  3. The state of Hawaii has said he was born there. That’s good enough for me,” “The president says he’s a Christian. I accept him at his word.”

  4. I for one (as well as all informed people) believe Obama is a cactus. He has never provided us with his Human-certificate, how are we to know he’s human. This fiasco must end, their is no reason a cactus should be in public office.

  5. Dear secular, what is truly troubling is not your radicalism,not your extremism, not your racism (though you are probably a racist) but your stupidity.

  6. Sorry #8, You really are foolosih.
    Why would the obummer spend nearly 2 million dollars defending the lawsuits? Why won’t he just produce an original birth certificate?

    Mr. Obummer, show us your birth certificate now!

  7. It’s amazing that the comments above are from rabid liars that are crafting fictions on this web site.
    Hawaii has confirmed that the birth certificate that Obama produced to the media in 2008 is in fact a legitimate copy of what they have on file in Hawaii.
    Were the president of the United States not a democrat or black, no one would be engaging in this nonsense and no one would respect the act of a white republican if he played to the drumbeat of lunatic Birth Deniers.

  8. The bottom line is, no one will ever know for sure if Obama is a qualified American President. But one thing is for sure- with all the leftist media backing him, he’ll continue to be able to avoid having to prove his citizenship.

  9. To number 10

    The certificate of which you speak was the “short form”. The short form certifies that there was a child born and there was a child registered to the state authorities. It simply recounts the testimony of the one providing the information. In Obama’s case his mother. There is no witnessed birth, as in a statndard ‘Long form’ birth certficate where there is an ‘attendant’ signature.

    The short form or ‘registration of birth’ can and was done, days to months after a birth. Especially in Hawaii and california 40-60 years ago when not every one was born in a haospital. People where registared AFTER they were born. In statndard ‘Long form’ the state is informed of the live birth immediately after the birth of a child and there must be a legal attendant/witness to the birth. Not so in the short form.

    Mr. Obama where is the long form birth certificate??

  10. Karl Rove as smart as he is, is trying to ‘moderate’ himself by placing distance between him and the so called ‘birhers’

    His lumping together of ‘birthers’ and 9-11 deniers would be laughable if it weren’t so sad and pathetic.

    Most conservatives are NOT 9-11 deniers neither are most republicans. The truth of Obama’s birth exemplifies this administration’s attitude and approach to the Constitution and the Law of the land.

    If the president need not be Born in the US (or give VALID proof thereof), as required by article II of the Constitution, then congress can pass and ENFORCE laws which the sates deem unconstitutional. Furtheremore if Obamacare is ever taken to the Supreme Court and is passed by a majority of Justices, its legitimacy will still be challenged because the appointees i.e Sotomayor and Kagan were not appointed by a legitimate (US born) president. So then, it is vital for the sake of the country to establish Mr. Obama’s citizenship, immedialtely.

    What’s the big deal???
    get the birth certificate!…no not the short certificate which is just the registering of a baby AFTER the birth, but the so called ‘Long form’ witnessed by a hospital attendant/ Nurse. Everyone has one., Every state has written record and copies…

    Mr. Obama where is your birth certificate ? where were you born??