Technology Identifies Lost Color On Historic Arch of Titus


arch-of-titus-menorahHistorical sources describe the menorah looted by the Romans when they destroyed the Second Bais Hamikdosh in Yerushalayim in A.D. 70 as made of gold, as the Ribono Shel instructed Moshe Rabbeinu.

So the recent discovery that a version of the menorah in a bas-relief on the first-century Arch of Titus in the Roman Forum was originally painted a rich yellow should not come as much of a surprise. But given that the image faded to the color of its underlying stone long ago – like so much else in and around the Forum – precise knowledge of its once-bright pigmentation comes as an exciting revelation to historians and archaeologists.

“The Bible said it was gold, but the monument, as it was seen for centuries, told us it was white,” said Steven Fine, the director of the Arch of Titus Digital Restoration Project and a professor of Jewish history at Yeshiva University in New York, which is sponsoring the project. “Isn’t it cool to be that much closer to the viewers of the first and second century?”

The findings were made possible using noninvasive spectrometry readings carried out on the arch this month.

“The advantage of this method is that it doesn’t harm the monument,” said Cinzia Conti, the state archaeologist responsible for the arch. The monument is not only an important part of Rome’s physical history but also “very significant for the Jewish community,” she said.

The arch, inaugurated in A.D. 81, has two interior reliefs that commemorate the Roman victory over Judea by Titus, a military commander and future emperor, and his father, the emperor Vespasian, a decade earlier. One relief shows Titus’ triumphal ride on a chariot, the other depicts a procession into Rome with loot from the Bais Hamikdosh, including the menorah as well as a sacred table and trumpets.

Professor Fine, who is the director of the Center for Israel Studies at Yeshiva, said that the menorah was a natural meeting ground for “both Jewish and Roman studies.”

For Jews, he said, the Arch of Titus has been an emotional lightning rod for nearly two millenniums. The Jewish community in Rome is the oldest in Europe. “For centuries the Jews in Rome would not walk under it, as they saw themselves as exiles from Jerusalem forcibly brought to Rome,” Professor Fine said. “Then in the 19th century the arch became a marker of Jewish antiquity and pride, a symbol of exile and redemption that is so important to Jewish heritage.”

The arch’s menorah is thought to be the image used for the emblem of the State of Israel, though that hypothesis has been debated.

In recent years there has been a drive on the part of archaeologists and historians to discover the original colors of ancient statues and monuments, boosted by technical advances in the field. (Tests for color carried out on many of the monuments in the Forum in the 1980s that removed samples from the stone did not yield significant results.)

The latest generation of ultraviolet-visual absorption spectrometers are more manageable and more sensitive, “so we can get a reading analyzing a grain of pigment on a square centimeter, and that is very helpful,” said Heinrich Piening, a conservator with the State of Bavaria Department for the Conservation of Castles, Gardens and Lakes in Germany.

Mr. Piening did spectrometric readings on the arch and compared them with a database of pigments and dyes to identify the original color. The menorah, he said, was painted a particular yellow ocher “that would have looked like gold from far away.”

Ms. Conti said more tests would be carried out on the rest of the arch, depending on financing.

The spectrometric readings will also be used to fine-tune “Rome Reborn,” a 3-D model of ancient Rome developed by Bernard Frischer, a professor of art history and classics at the University of Virginia. “The Arch of Titus will be the first monument in ‘Rome Reborn’ that will have full restored color,” said Dr. Frischer, who was part of the team working on the monument. “But we still have another 10,000 buildings to color.”


{ Newscenter}


  1. this is real non sense the arch has stood for a 1,000 year the weather has affected affected it all they now no is what my 3 year old grandson can tell its made of stone and thats what we see
    but where is the the real thing who has it and why isnt it being returned to us

  2. Instead of doing all kids of weird tests, lets just demand that the Vatican release the klei hamikdosh which are believed to be held in its secret vaults

  3. To #2:

    There are sources that state that the menorah depicted on the arch is a replica of candelabras that were found in the Bais Hamikdash. As for the arches being rounded, the Rambam clearly shows in a diagram of the menorah that it was straight.

  4. Actually there were a number of Menorahs in the Beis Hamikdash – most Rishonim agree (Rashi, Rambam as opposed to Ibn Ezra) the one in the Heichal was straight. This could be any one of a number which were removed

  5. The Rambam says that the original golden menorah was angular and not rounded. Original is probably hidden where no one knows or the Vatican has it. The one depicted from the Arch might have been (also gold) a duplicate just from the second Temple. The Lubavitcher say, according to Rambam, definitely angular.

  6. The Rambam says that the original golden menorah was angular and not rounded. Original is probably hidden where no one knows or the Vatican has it. The one depicted from the Arch (also gold) might have been a duplicate just from the second Temple or even misrepresented in the sculpture. According to Rambam, definitely angular.

  7. Today is the Yahrzeit of Harav Dovid Lifshitz ztl…He once mentioned that he was once in Rome and specifically was Mispallel at the arch to thank Hashem regarding Netzach Yisrael…

  8. The carver of this arch may never have seen the original menorah to have made an accurate copy. He lived in Rome and would have only seen it from far, if at all, during the victory procession. In addition, the Arch was built at least 12 years after the churban.
    Also, the Arch underwent a 4 year restoration starting in 1817 and was in pretty bad shape before then (see wikipedia Arch of Titus for a picture) so whatever it is they are seeing is probably less than 200 years old.

  9. #2 Boris,
    Sorry, no raiyeh. There might have been some artistic license, especially as the arch was built more than ten years later.
    PS the drawing in the Rambam might also be artistic license as decided by the printer – again no raiyeh!

  10. “For centuries the Jews in Rome would not walk under it, as they saw themselves as exiles from Jerusalem forcibly brought to Rome,”
    Actually it was a roman law that any Jew that had the chutzpah to walk under the arch was to be executed by nightfall.
    There’s a famous story that the Ponavicher Rav ZTZ”L visited Rome on one of his fundraising trips. He went under the arch with two talmidim. He them picked up his hands an loudly proclaimed: “Titus, Tiutus where are you today, but we’re still here – and learning Torah in Eretz Yisroel.

  11. I remember seeing an article that stated that the arch was built before Titus returned to Rome as a welcome. In that case, the artist would have depicted the menorah from hearsay and not after having seen it.
    ????? ????? ????? ????? ????!

  12. this is the depiction of the menora of the second temple. It was NOT the same as the menora of the first, nor was it made of gold.