The Biden administration’s mandate for federal contractors’ employees to be vaccinated will be halted nationwide, amid a slew of challenges from states that say the president overstepped his authority in requiring the Covid-19 shots.
Led by Georgia, the seven states that challenged the mandate set to take effect on Jan. 4 are likely to succeed in their lawsuits against the administration’s order, U.S. District Court Judge R. Stan Baker of the Southern District of Georgia said in an order issued Tuesday.
The Biden administration mandate applies to roughly a quarter of the U.S. workforce and affects companies that do business with the federal government, including Lockheed Martin Corp., Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc.‘s Google, and General Motors Co.
Baker’s order follows a Kentucky federal judge’s grant last week of a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit involving Kentucky, Tennessee, and Ohio. Baker echoed what his Kentucky counterpart said, that blocking the mandate didn’t indicate that the vaccine wouldn’t be effective to stopping the spread of Covid-19, but rather that Biden didn’t have the power to issue such an executive order.
Representatives from Georgia universities testified during an injunction hearing earlier this month, arguing that implementation of the mandate would be expensive, onerous, and cost them valuable employees who haven’t yet presented proof of vaccination. Those schools receive millions from the federal government.
The court found that the states could likely prove that Congress didn’t clearly authorize the president to issue the mandate, and that it “goes far beyond addressing administrative and management issues in order to promote efficiency and economy in procurement and contracting.” The 2017 nominee of President Donald Trump said, instead, the executive order works as a “regulation of public health.”
The federal contractor vaccine order is part of a suite of Biden administration actions designed to increase inoculation rates. In addition to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s emergency shot-or-test rule for large U.S. businesses, and the shot requirement for health-care companies paid by Medicare and Medicaid, Biden mandated vaccines for the federal workforce.
White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki defended that agenda at a press conference Tuesday.
“The reason that we proposed these requirements is that we know they work and we are confident in our ability, legally, to make these happen across the country,” Psaki said, noting the federal government—the nation’s largest employer—has successfully implemented such a requirement, with more than 92% of its workers now inoculated.
Idaho Gov. Brad Little cheered Tuesday’s ruling in a statement. The state is part of the Georgia-led contractor mandate challenge, as well as lawsuits against the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s shot-or-test emergency regulation for large U.S. businesses, and another inoculation rule for health-care workers.
“Yet another one of President Biden’s vaccine mandates have been temporarily shut down because the states—including Idaho—took a stand against his unprecedented government overreach into Americans’ lives and businesses,” Little said in the statement. “All three mandates are now completely stalled. We will continue to press forward in our fight against the federal government’s bad policies.”
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr also applauded the court’s decision in a statement. Carr and Little are both Republicans.
Allowing the executive order to move forward will have a “major impact on the economy at large, as it limits contractors’ and members of the workforce’s ability to perform work on federal contractors,” Baker said. “Accordingly, it appears to have vast economic and political significance.”
The government contractor mandate spurred a series of federal lawsuits from states seeking to block its implementation, including the one before Baker, where Georgia was also joined by Alabama, Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia. Also suing are Arizona, Florida, Texas, and Oklahoma. They argue that the administration lacks the authority to require vaccinations and the mandate violates the U.S. Constitution.
Associated Builders and Contractors, which joined in the seven-state suit welcomed the Baker’s ruling, though not unconditionally.
“This is a big win in removing compliance hurdles for the construction industry, which is facing economic challenges, such as a workforce shortage of 430,000, rising materials prices and supply chain issues,” group vice president Ben Brubeck said in a press statement. “ABC continues to support vaccinations and encourages members to use its COVID-19 vaccination toolkit, resources and guidance for federal contractors to keep workers safe on construction job sites.”
Numerous challenges to the Biden administration’s vaccine requirements are pending in courts, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit last month temporarily halted enforcement of the OSHA regulation. The Sixth Circuit is poised to consider those consolidated challenges to the OSHA rule.
(c) Bloomberg
{Matzav.com}
Does this help New Yorkers who have to deal with Emperor Deblasio’s mandate?
Unfortunately, no.
The City Council is thee most corrupt in the nation. They walk in lockstep with whatever the Mayor demands.
No, the constitution limits the federal governments ability to control things not mentioned in the constitution. IT gives this power to the state.
So for example say the government wants to foce everyone to wear green caps. The federla government needsto show from the constitution wh ythey have the right to do that. THey can argue try to argue it is part of interstate commerce (which is the federal govt’s domain) but if they cant point to a part of teh constituion that gives them the authority they cant enact the law.
For states it is somewhat reversed, any power not granted to the federal govt belongs to th states (10th amendment) . They can enact nay law as long as it does not violate another part of the constitution.
So if a state enacts a law requiring green caps., yo u can argue it vioaltes your speech or your religion opposes green caps. But if you cant provide such a clause, then the law fine.
So for vaccinations, there is no part of the constitution that gives the federal govt the right ot demand vaccinations (arguably), thus they don’t have this right it belongs to the states.
The states could enact this law, unless it violates your individual rights as outlined in the constitution. You have no right to eat in a restaurant, thus a state (or local) law preventing you from eating in a restaurant unless vaccinated would be fine . However voting , and religion are protected so they cant require a vaccine to go to shul or to vote.
Now of course if you are a Christian scientist who opposes vaccinations on religious grounds, that too must be respected by the state, but this isnt nogeah for frum Jws