Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Sunday declared there was a “great deal of evidence of fraud” and illegal election law changes that merit a “thorough investigation.”
In a contentious exchange on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopolous,” Paul called the host “a fool.”
“You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side,” he scolded.
“You’re inserting yourself into the story,” he said, adding: “I want to look at secretaries of state who changed the law — it happened. You can’t just sweep it under the rug. Nothing to see here. You’re a fool to bring this up. A journalist would hear both sides.”
According to Paul, Stephanopolous made a mistake, warning, that by “coming from the liberal side like you, you immediately say everything’s a lie, instead of saying there’s two sides to everything… you insert yourself in the middle … [saying] the absolute fact I’m saying is a lie.”
Read more at NEWSMAX.
{Matzav.com}
And yet he presents none. He has an election in 2022.
mail in votes without id , illegal in us , changed law without merit
Isn’t it fraud if I can tell my wife that she must vote as I do?
My daughter has no husband. She is of age to vote. I can ask her to vote as I do. She will. That is my third vote.
My son will vote. He has his own mind. He can be his own house. A vote per house. A man and his fit sons. They can vote.
Who can not think that this is voter fraud? A guy with more than one vote. And sons may not ask the same. The well of a boy. He may marry. Let him have 2 votes.
Who can dispose this dilemma. Who has the audacity to go after the prize that the loving daughters now have. They want to vote. It is empowering. They live for the smile they have. We see them on television. The filling day has jobs they can take. Who could even mention that we are no longer constitutional?
This is a buff of life.
To say Stephanopolous made a mistake, and that he is a fool is putting it too mildly. It is a way too kind.
While the election results and how they played out leaves a horrible smell, no one has been able to present any real evidence.
The changes of the voting laws, even if improper or illegal, didn’t change whom the people wanted to win; it only made changes that enabled people to express that opinion. So while it may have affected the outcome, it didn’t change voters opinion or prevent people from expressing that.
The only question that remains is were the votes that came in through the mails legitimate votes or ballot stuffing and not real votes. The way the votes that came in definitely appeared to be ballot stuffing, but no one has been able to show any hard of evidence of this. Until someone comes up with some hard evidence of this, we must accept the election.
the fact the interpreters of law the Supreme Courts of this nation laughed every lawsuit out. should be enough to for the average Joe to acknowledge no fraud. but apparently democracy is treated like sports.