Rubashkin Defense Rests; Deliberations Open Today


rubashkin2Prosecutors built their child labor case against Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin on the testimony of liars and thieves, and failed to prove that the former Agriprocessors Inc. executive allowed children to work at his family’s slaughterhouse, defense attorneys said Thursday.”What evidence has the state shown that Sholom Rubashkin intended minors to be in the plant? Not a shred,” defense attorney Mark Weinhardt said in a three-hour closing argument.

After a five-week trial, the jury will begin deliberations today. The maximum sentence could be up to 5½ years in prison.

Alleged child laborers who testified to working long hours and around dangerous machinery and chemicals were “practiced liars” about their identities, Weinhardt said.

He argued that the state pinned its case on two convicted thieves, Mark Spangler and Matthew Derrick.

Weinhardt urged the four-woman, three-man jury to focus on whether Rubashkin is criminally responsible for willfully allowing children to work in the plant. He said no one, including Rubashkin, wanted children working at the plant.

He reminded the jury that Derrick, the former supervisor, didn’t mention a conversation in which he warned Rubashkin about minors at the plant until he testified. Testimony revealed that he did not divulge the conversation in interviews with investigators building a case against Rubashkin.

“Here’s the bottom line: This conversation he claimed he had with Mr. Rubashkin, it didn’t happen,” he said.

Defense attorney F. Montgomery Brown highlighted the testimony of top managers who said they never saw what they believed to be minors inside the plant.

Brown at one point took off his gray suit coat and donned a white coat and hard hat. People look different when they put on the plant’s safety gear, he told the jury.

Weinhardt and Brown finished with a flourish. Weinhardt invoked John Adams, the nation’s second president, who said, “We are a nation of laws and not men.”

Brown also referred to the literary American classic, “Moby Dick.”

“You can feel from the absence of evidence – and the evidence itself – that they rushed to the conclusion that he was responsible, this white whale,” Brown said. “Moby Jew.”

{Des Moines Register/Noam Newscenter}



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here