Supreme Court Says Religious School Must Recognize LGBTQ Club, For Now

11
>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

The Supreme Court has reversed course and said Yeshiva University in New York must for now comply with a state court’s order that it should recognize a campus LGBTQ rights organization.

On a 5-4 vote, the justices said the religious school for now should comply with a New York state trial court ruling that, as a public accommodation, Yeshiva was covered under the New York City Human Rights Law and required to provide the Pride Alliance the same access to facilities as dozens of other student groups. The group said that includes a classroom, bulletin boards and a club fair booth.

The university asked the Supreme Court to intervene, and last week Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted it a temporary reprieve. But on Wednesday a majority of the justices said it was too soon for the high court to get involved.

“It appears that applicants have at least two further avenues for expedited or interim state court relief,” the court’s short order said. If those fail, Yeshiva can return to the Supreme Court. Though unsigned, it was the work of Sotomayor, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Four justices dissented, saying Yeshiva’s response to the student group was the result of “an interpretation of Torah . . . after careful study.”

“The First Amendment guarantees the right to the free exercise of religion, and if that provision means anything, it prohibits a State from enforcing its own preferred interpretation of Holy Scripture,” said the dissent, written by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. and joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. “Yet that is exactly what New York has done in this case, and it is disappointing that a majority of this Court refuses to provide relief.”

Alito said the four are likely to grant the case if the university is unsuccessful in New York state appeals court and “Yeshiva would likely win if its case came before us.”

In a filing asking the Supreme Court to step in, the university said that “as a deeply religious Jewish university, Yeshiva cannot comply with that order because doing so would violate its sincere religious beliefs about how to form its undergraduate students in Torah values.”

The school is represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which labeled the lower court ruling an “unprecedented” violation of the school’s First Amendment rights.

The student club called the lower court’s decision a straightforward interpretation of state law, saying the Supreme Court’s intervention was unwarranted – especially before New York’s appellate courts have weighed in.

“This ruling does not touch the University’s well-established right to express to all students its sincerely held beliefs about Torah values and … orientation,” the group said in its filing at the high court. At the same time, it says, “it may not deny certain students access to the non-religious resources it offers the entire student community on the basis of sexual orientation.”

The school does not require its officers or professors to be Jewish and it enrolls 5,000 undergraduate and graduate students of all religious backgrounds, the group said. Its affiliated Cardozo Law School has had an official LGBTQ students group for years.

(c) 2022, The Washington Post · Robert Barnes 

{Matzav.com}


11 COMMENTS

  1. אַל דֳּמִי לָךְ אַל תֶּחֱרַשׁ וְאַל תִּשְׁקֹט אֵל
    כִּי הִנֵּה אוֹיְבֶיךָ יֶהֱמָיוּן וּמְשַׂנְאֶיךָ נָשְׂאוּ רֹאשׁ
    עַל עַמְּךָ יַעֲרִימוּ סוֹד וְיִתְיָעֲצוּ עַל צְפוּנֶיךָ
    אָמְרוּ לְכוּ וְנַכְחִידֵם מִגּוֹי וְלֹא יִזָּכֵר שֵׁם יִשְׂרָאֵל עוֹד
    כִּי נוֹעֲצוּ לֵב יַחְדָּו עָלֶיךָ בְּרִית יִכְרֹתוּ

  2. Can’t YU remedy the situation by just saying “we ban all student clubs”? I browsed a little bit online and saw that YU has an application process for clubs. That tells me that these clubs are official clubs of the yeshiva. But if YU would say “we’re putting an end to all clubs”, wouldn’t that remedy the situation? Isn’t that the best solution if YU can’t win this case in the courts?

  3. They will probably be distracted by the cross politics and grass-drop displays.

    This eventually seems to be remote to the power of education.

    Graduate and it tries no more.

  4. Thats not what the Supreme Court said.. They just refused to put a stay in place and told them to go thru whole ny system and come back to Supreme Court if necc

  5. While it is good that YU tried to block the club, at the same time it has been unfortunately sending mixed messages on the issue, by saying that while it opposes the club, it welcomes and accepts toeivah students. Also, the dean of its RIETS rabbinic school, “Rabbi” Marc S. (Menachem, but he is no consolation) Penner, has an organization promoting acceptance of OTD children who practice toeivah.

  6. When informed that the Supreme Court has said the school must recognize the LGBTQ club, for now, one student complained to reporters that: “It’s difficult for me to recognize ANYONE in that club because the members of the club make it difficult for me to recognize which one of them is actually a man or a woman or an L or a G or a T or a Q.”
    The student continued: “I would approach them and ask them to identify which one of the above they are, but my teachers told me to mind my Ps and Qs.”
    “Recognizing them is definitely a tough task for me,” the student added, “and I’m not anywhere close to dotting the the i’s and crossing the t’s on this one.”

  7. YU should have expelled them if such students and their actions were actually against their “torah values” but they say their values are to welcome them. So they deserve this ruling as it makes clear to the world that the “torah values” of YU is to welcome students who are proud to violate chayvie krisohs, and that their “torah values” are not those of yeshivohs who actually uphold the torah’s values.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here