Watch: The Extent of the Obligation to Lend Money to Those in Need

1

Q and A with Rabbi Dovid Grossman

Moderated by Rabbi Yitzchok Hisiger

WATCH:

Question: Many people have been struggling financially over the past few months due to Covid-19. How much of an obligation do other Jews who are financially better off have to lend money to those in need? Do they need to help even if they suspect they may not receive the money in return?

Answer: The Torah states in Parshas Mishpatim regarding loaning money to another Jew, “אם כסף תלוה את עמי”, “if you lend my people money” (Shemos 22:24). Why does the Torah frame lending money, which is certainly a mitzvah, with the word “if,” implying that one need not lend if he so chooses?

Some mefarshim, such as the Da’as Zekeinim, explain that the mitzvah to lend money does not apply in every situation. For example, if one is not sure that he will receive the money in return, he has no obligation to lend the money. Therefore, one may choose whether he wishes to lend money depending on the situation.

Certainly, this mitzvah of lending money is an extremely important one. According to the Rambam, the mitzvah to lend money is even greater than tzedaka (which is not returned to the giver). However, a loan allows the recipient to stand on his own two feet with dignity, rather than accepting charity from another, which can often cause embarrassment.

Nevertheless, we see from the expression “im kesef talveh” that one only needs to lend in a manner where he will receive his money back, such as with a shtar (contract), edim (witnesses), an arev (guarantor), etc. If this is not possible, though, the lender is not required to jeopardize his own livelihood, as the Torah states “אפס כי לא יהיה בך אביון” (Devarim 15:4), and the mitzvah would not apply (some even say it is better not to lend in this case).

Question: If a person owns a store or business, is he obligated to sell someone struggling financially on credit because of this mitzvah?

Answer: The Chafetz Chaim in his work Ahavas Chesed says that a storekeeper extending credit to a consumer is not necessarily included in this mitzvah. Rather, it is similar to a case of one who earns his livelihood through lending non-Jews with interest and is then asked by a Jew for a loan. This person is not obligated to lend money to the Jew for free within the framework of this mitzvah since lending to goyim on interest is considered his parnasa.

So too, a storeowner is not required to extend credit to customers in need since the business constitutes his livelihood.

The Ahavas Chesed suggests a second reason why a store owner need not extend credit to a needy customer. He explains that the mitzvah of lending money applies only to actual money, as that is the definition of a halva’ah, or loan. However, since extending credit does not involve a loan of actual money, it is not included in this mitzvah (though it certainly fulfills the general mitzvah of gemilus chasadim).

To receive this daily via WhatsApp or email.:

SIGN UP BELOW:
You can sign up for this program via any of the mediums above, or by clicking on the link below.
The Bais HaVaad Halacha Center maintains a fully functioning Bais Din and provides a full suite of business halacha guidance and services. From contracts and partnership agreements to heter iskas, wills, and shabbos business arrangements, the Bais HaVaad ensures that halachic life is fully accessible and practical for all.
Business Halacha Hotline: 1.888.485.VAAD (8223)
Website: BaisHavaad.org
Email: info@baishavaad.org

1 COMMENT

  1. Just a comment:

    The article seems to imply that with ” … a shtar (contract), edim (witnesses), an arev (guarantor), etc.” one can count on getting their money back.
    Unfortunately, in this day and age one can NOT count on getting their money back even with ” a shtar (contract), edim (witnesses), an arev (guarantor), etc.”. The ultimate excuse today is: AIN LEE. I don’t have any money to pay you back. No denials. No ‘I already paid you” just ain lee. Its is more often then not that the Arev does not pay either. Either he says ‘ain lee’ as the loveh says, or they come up with halachic excuses why the areivos was not 100% valid.
    The root to the issue may be that today people borrow money without knowing how they will pay back which I think is totally against Halacha. Although I saw a teshuvah from an Israeli posek saying that in Israel this is how people borrow and thus is OK (don’t know the reasoning…)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here