Chayim Aruchim Presents Case Against Assisted Suicide in Albany Meeting with Legislators

8

Having spent the last several years advocating for the rights of critically ill patients in hospitals and other medical facilities all over the world, Chayim Aruchim took to Albany to speak personally with key elected officials about the importance of defeating proposed legislation that would legalize physician assisted suicide in New York State.

Among those in attendance at the March 20th meeting were Rabbi Shmuel Lefkowitz, vice president for community services at Agudath Israel of America, Dr. Daniel Berman, an infectious disease specialist practicing at Montefiore Medical Center, Rabbi Shmuel Blech, a leading Lakewood New Jersey rabbi and a member of the New Jersey State Legislature’s ethics committee, Assemblyman Richard Gottfried, chairman of the Assembly’s committee on health, Senator Diane Savino, Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, Rabbi Berish Fried, Chayim Aruchim’s New York State project director and Leon Goldenberg, member of the board of trustees, Agudath Israel of America.

After a brief introduction by Rabbi Lefkowitz who stressed the importance of viewing the issue of physician assisted suicide from an intellectual instead of an emotional perspective, Dr. Berman spoke passionately about analyzing the proposed legislation by weighing the associated risks with the expected benefits.

Referencing a study done by the Journal of Emergency Medicine, Dr. Berman explained that there is a significant discrepancy between the preferences of healthy individuals who advocate for death with dignity, and the wishes of those who are living with severe medical issues. According to the study, only 18 percent of doctors and nurses said that they would want to live if they had sustained a debilitating spinal cord injury, while 92 percent of patients with that type of injury said that they would choose to go on living despite their medical challenges.

The lesson is clear, noted Dr. Berman. Physicians often present options for medical treatment based on their own value system instead of considering their patient’s preferences, making it extremely risky to enact legislation that would allow doctors to be influenced by their own views when offering patients medical options.

Enacting legislation that would legalize physician assisted suicide in terminal patients is “a slippery slope,” warned Dr. Berman. Several European countries who originally offered assisted suicide only to terminal patients have now relaxed their criteria, offering euthanasia as a choice to those who are disabled, mentally ill or suffering from non-fatal illnesses. Other alarming trends in the medical world are palliative care specialists who try to convince patients to end their lives and financial incentives being offered for hastening death in certain patients.

Dr. Berman concluded by drawing on his thirty years of experience with patients in end of life scenarios and noting that the risks of assisted suicide far outweigh the intended benefits.

The final presenter of the meeting was Rabbi Blech, who expressed his concerns that legalizing assisted suicide would undermine the sanctity of life while sending a clear message to the disabled and infirm that their lives have no value.

Enacting this legislation would give the vulnerable feelings of hopelessness and uselessness and could even be construed as intellectual intimidation, explained Rabbi Blech. Even more disturbing is the notion that physician assisted suicide supporters appear to be motivated solely by the idea that a life that is less than perfect is not worth living.

“The moral compass, which forever remains steady, is now subject to the strange messages that we have allowed ourselves to communicate,” said Rabbi Blech. “We have unwittingly become the victims of a pervasive cultural sleight of hand. I deeply respect the work that has gone into the preparation of this legislation … but yet cannot say in honesty that the reason for physician assisted suicide is the underlying illness suffered by the patient.”

Rabbi Blech also emphasized that for generations, optimism has been the hallmark of the United States, a quality that has allowed our country to enjoy unparalleled success in a relatively short period of time. Rabbi Blech mentioned several prominent Americans who rose above significant challenges to live remarkable lives; Helen Keller triumphed over multiple handicaps in her lifetime, but if she were living today, death with dignity advocates would likely attempt to persuade her to end her life because of her physical shortcomings.

That same American spirit of positivity was evident during Rabbi Blech’s formative years.

“Challenges were opportunities for growth,” said Rabbi Blech. “This is the message that I received and one that I would like to transmit to my children.”

Dealing with life and death issues brings with it great responsibility, one that should not be taken lightly, advised Rabbi Blech.

“We must proceed with great caution, with the full realization of the enormous consequences that our decision may affect,” said Rabbi Blech.

By: Sandy Eller

8 COMMENTS

  1. Why do people try to ban things they won’t use! Let the people who want to stop suffering use it. who are they to judge whats right for an average American!

  2. #1

    Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky was very perturbed that when
    an Abortion Clinic opened near Monsey,yidden continued going on untroubled apparently by the development,with the same attitude as yours

  3. Doctor Assisted Suicide is just a sly euphemism for Doctor Assisted Homicide
    ‘Right to Die’ is just a sly euphemism for Right To Kill

  4. Regarding attempts to pass “Death with Dignity” legislation:

    The chiyuv (Torah injunction) of “Lo sa’amod al dam re’echa”, obligates everyone to do what he
    or she can, to help prevent assisted suicide and/or euthanasia.

    Allowing the legalization of “assisted suicide”, even if this particular law in practice would only
    result in assisting a suicide and not euthanasia, is to allow shefichas-domim (bloodshed).
    Furthermore even rendering such actions not being subject to prosecution, is allowing shefichas-
    domim (bloodshed), al achas kama vekama (how much more so), in cases of assisted suicide
    leading to euthanasia.

    This obligation would include:

    1) Voting on the basis of this issue. Thus, when voting for any public official, this issue must
    be considered as top priority, certainly overriding financial considerations, government
    programs, etc. By voting for people who support these laws, we become accountable for
    their actions. This ruling would still apply even if these laws were to be passed, we would
    still be forbidden to vote for legislators who voted for these laws. This is the most
    important way to fulfill our obligation.

    2) Urging one’s legislators to vote against these bills, if and when they arise[1] and to urge
    the governor to veto such bill, were it to pass the legislature.

    3) Helping in efforts to repeal such laws, in areas[2] where such legislation was already
    passed.

    May the Creator of all life grace us with the merit to save innocent lives, fulfilling our role as an or
    legoyim (light onto the nations). In that merit, may we help usher in the Final Redemption by
    Moshiach Tzidkeinu.

    Rabbonim are listed alphabetically.

    Eliyahu Ben-Haim Boruch Hirschfeld Dovid Ribiat

    Haim Benoliel Yosef Meir Kantor Yosef Yitzchok Rosenfeld

    Gad Bouskila Yeshaye Gedalye Kaufman Chaim Schabes

    Yitzchok M. Braun Amram Klein Moshe Silberberg

    Shlomo Breslauer Shloime Ben Zion Kokis Moshe Soloveitchik

    Eliyahu Brog Grainom Lazewnik Yitzchok Sorotzkin

    Yitzchok Cohen Shmuel Miller Tzvi Steinberg

    Menachem Fisher Avrohom Yaakov Nelkenbaum Shlomo Stern

    Noson Yermia Goldstein Yechiel Perr Boruch Hersh Waldman

    Shmuel Gorelick Avrohom Reich Moshe Weissman

    Moshe Green Gavriel Zinner

  5. #1 Are You so affected by trends of the era?!?!

    If someone wants to commit suicide ,how can we stop them?
    Although we do send police to try convince him/her

    But to allow someone else (nurse,etc.) to have a hand in it ?!?!
    That is murder!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here