Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson suggested in an interview with The New York Times that the Syrian government’s targeting of civilians in its five-year civil war was similar to the accidental bombing of civilians by U.S.-supported forces. He was pressed as to whether he thought these things were similar and seemed to suggest he did.
“Well no, of course not—we’re so much better than all that,” Johnson said sarcastically. “We’re so much better when in Afghanistan, we bomb the hospital and 60 people are killed in the hospital.” He went on to not name North Korea’s leader when asked. Read more at THE NEW YORK TIMES.
{Matzav.com}
It boggles the mind that there are actually people who would vote for this airhead.
Agreed. He’s a trendy choice, largely due to voters’ distaste for both Clinton and Trump, but once you take a closer look at him it becomes very obvious that he’s even less qualified than those two.
They (myself included until now) don’t know how bad he is. They just know how bad Clinton, Trump, & Stiener are.
I’m fully aware of Johnson’s views, my eyes are wide open, and I support his candidacy. Why do you make such blanket assumptions?
It’s obvious to all that he’s pathetic choice. My opinion as to why media even contends with him is because he’s taking votes away from Hillary and they’re desperate for Hillary to get back those votes. Let’s daven that trump makes a comeback
What utter demagoguery with the “what is Aleppo” screenshot… Way to degrade any coverage on the story and directly call attention to how much of a troll you are as a publication.
Johnson supporters have full faith in his sensibility toward foreign policy, and more active duty military support him over Hillary and Trump. When it comes to foreign policy, vote with the troops. And stop challenging the intelligence of his supporters; its not working in your favor.
The mind is a terrible thing to waste.