A Cheap Drug Is Found to Save Bleeding Victims

>>Follow Matzav On Whatsapp!<<

stabbing-bloodFor months, a simple generic drug has been saving lives on America’s battlefields by slowing the bleeding of even gravely wounded soldiers.

Even better, it is cheap. But its very inexpensiveness has slowed its entry into American emergency rooms, where it might save the lives of bleeding victims of car crashes, shootings and stabbings – up to 4,000 Americans a year, according to a recent study.

Because there is so little profit in it, the companies that make it do not champion it.

However, the drug is edging slowly closer to adoption as hospitals in New York and other major cities debate adding it to their pharmacies. The drug, tranexamic acid, has long been sold over the counter in Britain and Japan for heavy menstrual flow. After a groundbreaking 2010 trial on 20,000 hemorrhaging trauma patients in 40 countries showed that it saved lives, the British and American Armies adopted it. The World Health Organization added it to its essential drugs list last year, and British ambulances now carry it.

But outside Britain, it is used in very few civilian hospitals, though almost six million people around the world die each year of trauma – 400,000 of them in hospitals. A study published March 1 in BMC Emergency Medicine estimated that the drug could save up to 128,000 of those lives a year, 4,000 of them in the United States.

The slowness of American hospitals is due to “inertia,” said Dr. Ian Roberts, clinical trials director for the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and leader of the 2010 trial, which was called Crash-2. “The people who do the urging and the talking about new drugs are the pharmaceutical companies, and if they’re not interested, it’s not done.”

Many companies in India and China make tranexamic acid. Pfizer, which makes an injectable form for hemophiliacs (and donated thousands of doses to the Crash-2 trial), declined to give sales figures or even discuss administering it to trauma patients because the Food and Drug Administration has not approved that use. A company spokeswoman declined to say whether Pfizer had applied for approval. (Doctors may prescribe approved drugs for “off-label” uses, but drugmakers cannot endorse off-label uses without F.D.A. permission.)

The drug is believed to block plasmin, an enzyme that dissolves blood clots.

New York City’s public hospital trauma doctors “are excited about the possibilities and discussing the risks and benefits” said Ana Marengo, a spokeswoman for the city’s Health and Hospitals Corporation. A decision will be made “in a couple of months,” she said.

Spokesmen for Cook County Hospitals in Chicago, San Francisco General Hospital and Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta said they too were moving toward using it, probably within two months. Los Angeles County hospitals have no such plans yet, a spokesman said.

Crash-2, which showed that getting the drug within three hours reduced the risk of fatal hemorrhage by 30 percent, “was an amazing study,” said Dr. John B. Holcomb, chief of trauma surgery at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, which does use the drug. “Twenty thousand patients, and it was done in some places that had no lab tests.”

The United States Army took note when the drug was used on its soldiers in British Army hospitals.

“So we had a dog in that fight,” said Dr. Todd E. Rasmussen, an Air Force colonel who is now deputy commander of the Army Institute of Surgical Research in San Antonio.

American surgeons were skeptical, he said, until he led a follow-up study, called Matters, which looked at the fates of 896 British patients.

It found that severely wounded patients who got the drug survived twice as often as those who had not; that convinced his American colleagues.

Recent wars have taught combat surgeons many new lessons that later caught on in civilian emergency rooms, said Dr. David E. Lounsbury, a retired colonel and co-author of a 2008 Army textbook, “War Surgery in Afghanistan and Iraq: A Series of Cases, 2003-2007.”

Traditional hemorrhage treatment – giving intravenous saline solution to restore blood pressure – actually killed patients, he said, because it diluted clotting factors. Army doctors switched to giving blood and plasma; then, in the mid-2000s, added recombinant factor VIIa, a very expensive new clotting drug. But use of it faded, he said, after some patients got life-threatening clots on evacuation flights.

Tranexamic acid was never even in his combat hospital’s pharmacy. “An old generic doesn’t have any hair-on-your-chest bravado, so we didn’t even take it to the battlefield,” Dr. Lounsbury said.

That the British pioneered it “makes complete sense to me,” he added. “I worked in their hospitals, and they did pretty much everything we did – but much more cheaply.”

Dr. Holcomb, in Houston, said his hospital, the only one he knew that was now using it, gives it only to patients whose blood fails a clotting test. He insists on the test, even though it adds half an hour, because he is skeptical of one Crash-2 conclusion: that there are no side effects.

“Every drug has side effects,” he said. “Even aspirin.”

Dr. Roberts, in London, responded, “Well, John Holcomb’s intuition may be that there must be side effects, but we looked at 20,000 patients and the data doesn’t show it.”

{NY Times/Matzav.com Newscenter}


  1. Reading this makes me feel sick! 120,000 lives a year that were wasted because drug companies were not making enough money from it. What a world we live in!!

  2. Matzav. I’ve noticed a trend among my years of looking at your website. You post gruesome pictures (probally to provoke a response), and then ignore all coments to remove them. Please respect your readers opinions.

  3. Some of us are queesy and cannot bear seeing such pictures. Pls editors do not make us suffer for no reason and remove this picture and do not print others like it in the future. T

  4. In this country, it’s all about money. If a treatment that works is cheap, it is not promoted and even discouraged. The U.S. is way behind other countries in treating illnesses because all they care about is making money from dangerous drugs that are more harmful than good.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here