To bridge experts, the collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge after being hit by a heavy cargo ship was as unsurprising as it was devastating.
When a vessel as heavy as the Singapore-flagged Dali collides with such force against one of the span’s supercolumns, or piers, the result is the type of catastrophic, and heartbreaking, chain reaction that took place early Tuesday.
“If the pier was destroyed like it was, the bridge has to collapse,” said Dan Frangopol, a bridge engineering and risk professor at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania who is president of the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety.
“If the column is destroyed, basically the structure will fall down,” he said. “It’s not possible to redistribute the loads. It was not designed for these things.”
Maryland officials did not immediately answer questions about what protective devices may have been place in the water near the bridge and whether they were sufficient for any collision with such an important span.
Ian Firth, a British structural engineer and bridge designer, reviewed video footage and said there appeared to be at least two protective objects in the water next to the Key Bridge. The objects, known as “dolphins,” are supposed to protect maritime structures from being hit by vessels. But Dali, the container ship that struck the bridge, appeared to have come in “at an angle,” Firth said, which means the devices were unable to prevent the ship from striking the bridge, sending part of it tumbling into the water below.
Firth said in a telephone interview that he was “not surprised” at how quickly the bridge came down after it was hit. He noted that the support structure that was struck, which would have been made of reinforced concrete, was one of two main supports responsible for doing “all the work” to hold up the bridge.
He said the ship appeared to have strayed to one side before striking the bridge, which appeared to have a lightweight support structure.
If the Dali had been traveling straight on instead of at an angle, Firth said, it probably would have hit the protective objects. And if there had been three or four vessel-protection objects around the bridge, the outcome might have been different, Firth said, adding that he expects lessons will be learned from Tuesday’s tragedy.
Firth noted that the bridge, which was built in 1977, was erected at a time when ships were not as big as they are now and the flow of traffic was not as busy. These days, structures are designed with better protective measures in place, he said, though he noted that even a brand-new bridge would have “come down in the same way” if it were hit by such a large vessel traveling at speed.
Firth called the incident tragic and “very rare indeed.” He said the large container ship would not have had to be traveling very fast to have had such an impact, one that the bridge was simply not engineered to withstand.
In video imagery, the ship can be seen losing electrical power, then briefly regaining it before going completely dark. The ship then veers to the right, directly toward the bridge’s structural support.
The rudder may have gotten stuck in a position that caused the ship to turn, said a senior retired maritime official, who spoke on background while waiting for more details on the incident. It’s also possible that an incoming tide could have been a factor, he said.
“Obviously, they could not control the ship. They could not stop the ship,” he said.
Ships coming in and out of Baltimore Harbor must be guided by a state-licensed pilot who is familiar with the shipping channel and navigational hazards.
The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating.
(c) 2024, The Washington Post · Michael Laris, Jennifer Hassan, Joel Achenbach
Perhaps this was a retribution from Hakadosh Boruch Hu against America for not supporting Yidden as this effects economy hurting Biden
Not surprisingly, The Compost omitted the most important part why the bridge collapsed so easily which the Guardian included – a little video showing explosions along the bridge. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION like the WTC and Building 7.
Besides, there was another bridge destroyed yesterday in Ohio.
Maryland police were prewarned to diver traffic before the bridge collapsed.
Correct.
They received a mayday call from the ship and shut down the bridge.
If you are correct that it is a false flag attack, why have they not accused anyone of perpetrating it?
Isn’t that the whole point of a false flag?
I don’t think it is beyond the agencies to do that, they have since admitted that the gulf of Tonkin incident was orchestrated as a false flag.
In this case however, I don’t think that is the case.
This bridge was built about 50 years ago.
Since then there have been lessons, learned from other incidents and accidents, both in the United States and across the world.
New bridges are designed to have a low draft and very shallow waters around the piers that support the bridge. This causes ships to run aground before being able to make contact with the support pillar.
This has not been incorporated in older bridges because retrofitting thousands of older bridges across the US that were designed before we learned that lesson, because it would cost tens or hundreds of billions of dollars if not more. Because such incidents are considered to be “black swan incidents“ it was not deemed to be worthwhile.
However, I think that there should be a review of all such bridges, and perhaps there should be a set of criteria for which we say this bridge needs something to mitigate the risk.
And then there are bridges that bring huge amounts of toll revenue, where the cost of such a project ought not be an excuse. The Verrazano Narrows bridge with its extremely steep tolls. It brings in hundreds of millions of dollars a year. Almost none of that money goes towards bridge maintenance. There is simply no excuse for them to not build up an area around the two columns that support the bridge and create some sort of barrier that would stop a ship. There are hundreds of thousands of cars crossing the Verrazano daily and there is no time of the day or night where the casualty count would be anywhere near this low were such an incident to occur.
Nothing to do with the age of the bridge and everything to do with the evil ones behind it. Just like 9/11, the train derailments, the Boeing airplanes “technical issues”.
The problem is that whenever someone proposes to do something about our critical infrastructure needs the Republicans blast it unmercifully as wasteful spending. Biden’s infrastructure bill has $12.5 billion over five years for bridges and requires a 50 percent match from states for large bridge projects. A few years ago the American Society of Civil Engineers estimated the needs at ten times that amount. We will continue to have disasters lime this until we pony up the money to fix the problems.